Of tails and dogs: Standards, standardisation and innovation in assessment

P. Maharg, Julian Webb
{"title":"Of tails and dogs: Standards, standardisation and innovation in assessment","authors":"P. Maharg, Julian Webb","doi":"10.22459/CP01.2019.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The title of the conference from which some of the chapters in this book spring was ‘50 Years of Assessment in Legal Education’. The conference was an opportunity to look back, but also to look forward and think about how our legacy was formed in the last half century, and what of it we wanted to carry forward and shape differently in the future. In this chapter, we shall begin by giving a brief snapshot of legal education reform movements currently taking place in the Common Law world. We shall take one example of a recent consultation project in England and Wales, namely the Legal Education and Training Review (LETR), and analyse the project’s view on assessment.1 We shall consider then some of the hegemonic values and practices in assessment and why they can make change difficult to achieve. That it can take place, though, is evidenced by the assessment practices outlined in this book. It is also evidenced in other disciplines and other jurisdictions, and we shall consider some examples of that before ending with some examples of more radical assessment practices.","PeriodicalId":135601,"journal":{"name":"Critical Perspectives on the Scholarship of Assessment and Learning in Law: Volume 1: England","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Perspectives on the Scholarship of Assessment and Learning in Law: Volume 1: England","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22459/CP01.2019.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The title of the conference from which some of the chapters in this book spring was ‘50 Years of Assessment in Legal Education’. The conference was an opportunity to look back, but also to look forward and think about how our legacy was formed in the last half century, and what of it we wanted to carry forward and shape differently in the future. In this chapter, we shall begin by giving a brief snapshot of legal education reform movements currently taking place in the Common Law world. We shall take one example of a recent consultation project in England and Wales, namely the Legal Education and Training Review (LETR), and analyse the project’s view on assessment.1 We shall consider then some of the hegemonic values and practices in assessment and why they can make change difficult to achieve. That it can take place, though, is evidenced by the assessment practices outlined in this book. It is also evidenced in other disciplines and other jurisdictions, and we shall consider some examples of that before ending with some examples of more radical assessment practices.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尾巴和狗:标准、标准化和评估创新
这本书的一些章节来自于会议的标题是“法律教育评估的50年”。这次会议是一个回顾过去的机会,也是一个展望未来的机会,思考我们的遗产是如何在过去的半个世纪中形成的,以及我们希望在未来发扬光大并以不同的方式塑造它。在本章中,我们将首先简要介绍目前在普通法世界发生的法律教育改革运动。我们将以英格兰和威尔士最近的一个咨询项目为例,即法律教育和培训审查(LETR),并分析该项目对评估的看法然后,我们将考虑评估中的一些霸权价值观和做法,以及它们为什么会使变革难以实现。但是,本书中概述的评估实践证明了这一点。它也在其他学科和其他司法管辖区得到证明,在以一些更激进的评估实践的例子结束之前,我们将考虑其中的一些例子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Using legal policy and law reform as assessment Prepared for practice? Assessment for the Bar, 1975–2015 Digital assessment for the YouTube generation: Reflective practice in 21st-century legal education Take-home exams: Developing professionalism via assessment Of tails and dogs: Standards, standardisation and innovation in assessment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1