Foreign Direct Investment and Foreign Portfolio Investment in the Contemporary Globalized World: Should They Be Still Treated Separately?

Marcin Humanicki, R. Kelm, K. Olszewski
{"title":"Foreign Direct Investment and Foreign Portfolio Investment in the Contemporary Globalized World: Should They Be Still Treated Separately?","authors":"Marcin Humanicki, R. Kelm, K. Olszewski","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2369231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Foreign direct investment (FDI) and foreign portfolio investment (FPI) have been long considered as distinct and independent forms of international capital flows, but in the globalized world there are reasons to treat them as interconnected phenomena. This paper analyzes the mutual relationship between FDI and FPI and attempts to answer the question whether they complement or substitute for each other from a foreign investor’s point of view. Firstly, the paper describes the main characteristics of FDI and FPI in terms of a trade-off between their volatility and profitability. Secondly, it provides a literature review on the determinants of these two types of foreign investment. Finally, we analyse the long-run and short-run relationships between FDI and FPI running VECM regressions on data for Poland. Our research suggests that these two forms of foreign investment are substitutes. To be more specific, in economically stable periods FDI tends to dominate over FPI, but during insecurity and economic distress, both in source and host countries, FPI starts to gain importance.","PeriodicalId":259955,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Open Macroeconomics in Transition Economics (Topic)","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Open Macroeconomics in Transition Economics (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2369231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Foreign direct investment (FDI) and foreign portfolio investment (FPI) have been long considered as distinct and independent forms of international capital flows, but in the globalized world there are reasons to treat them as interconnected phenomena. This paper analyzes the mutual relationship between FDI and FPI and attempts to answer the question whether they complement or substitute for each other from a foreign investor’s point of view. Firstly, the paper describes the main characteristics of FDI and FPI in terms of a trade-off between their volatility and profitability. Secondly, it provides a literature review on the determinants of these two types of foreign investment. Finally, we analyse the long-run and short-run relationships between FDI and FPI running VECM regressions on data for Poland. Our research suggests that these two forms of foreign investment are substitutes. To be more specific, in economically stable periods FDI tends to dominate over FPI, but during insecurity and economic distress, both in source and host countries, FPI starts to gain importance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当代全球化世界中的外国直接投资和外国证券投资:它们还应该分开对待吗?
长期以来,外国直接投资(FDI)和外国证券投资(FPI)一直被认为是不同的、独立的国际资本流动形式,但在全球化的世界中,有理由将它们视为相互关联的现象。本文分析了FDI与FPI之间的相互关系,并试图从外国投资者的角度回答它们是互补还是相互替代的问题。首先,本文描述了FDI和FPI在波动性和盈利能力之间的权衡方面的主要特征。其次,对这两类外国投资的决定因素进行了文献综述。最后,我们通过对波兰数据的VECM回归分析了FDI和FPI之间的长期和短期关系。我们的研究表明,这两种形式的外国投资是相互替代的。更具体地说,在经济稳定时期,外国直接投资往往比外国直接投资占主导地位,但在不安全和经济困境期间,无论是在来源国还是东道国,外国直接投资都开始变得重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
북한의 관광정책 추진 동향과남북 관광협력에 대한 시사점 (The Trends of North Korean Tourism Policy and the Implications for Inter-Korean Cooperation) 체제전환국의 FDI 유입 결정요인과 북한에 대한 시사점 (Determinants of FDI in Transition Economies and Implications for North Korea) Main Trends and Key Takeaways Export and Inventory: Evidence from Chinese Firms Bilateral Rent-Seeking and Growth of FDI Inflow in China: Theory and Evidence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1