Programming Language Abstractions for Modularly Verified Distributed Systems

James R. Wilcox, Ilya Sergey, Zachary Tatlock
{"title":"Programming Language Abstractions for Modularly Verified Distributed Systems","authors":"James R. Wilcox, Ilya Sergey, Zachary Tatlock","doi":"10.4230/LIPIcs.SNAPL.2017.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Distributed systems are rarely developed as monolithic programs. Instead, like any software, these systems may consist of multiple program components, which are then compiled separately and linked together. Modern systems also incorporate various services interacting with each other and with client applications. However, state-of-the-art verification tools focus predominantly on verifying standalone, closed-world protocols or systems, thus failing to account for the compositional nature of distributed systems. For example, standalone verification has the drawback that when protocols and their optimized implementations evolve, one must re-verify the entire system from scratch, instead of leveraging compositionality to contain the reverification effort. \n \nIn this paper, we focus on the challenge of modular verification of distributed systems with respect to high-level protocol invariants as well as for low-level implementation safety properties. We argue that the missing link between the two is a programming paradigm that would allow one to reason about both high-level distributed protocols and low-level implementation primitives in a single verification-friendly framework. Such a link would make it possible to reap the benefits from both the vast body of research in distributed computing, focused on modular protocol decomposition and consistency properties, as well as from the recent advances in program verification, enabling construction of provably correct systems implementations. To showcase the modular verification challenges, we present some typical scenarios of decomposition between a distributed protocol and its implementations. We then describe our ongoing research agenda, in which we are attempting to address the outlined problems by providing a typing discipline and a set of domain-specific primitives for specifying, implementing and verifying distributed systems. Our approach, mechanized within a proof assistant, provides the means of decomposition necessary for modular proofs about distributed protocols and systems.","PeriodicalId":231548,"journal":{"name":"Summit on Advances in Programming Languages","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Summit on Advances in Programming Languages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.SNAPL.2017.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Distributed systems are rarely developed as monolithic programs. Instead, like any software, these systems may consist of multiple program components, which are then compiled separately and linked together. Modern systems also incorporate various services interacting with each other and with client applications. However, state-of-the-art verification tools focus predominantly on verifying standalone, closed-world protocols or systems, thus failing to account for the compositional nature of distributed systems. For example, standalone verification has the drawback that when protocols and their optimized implementations evolve, one must re-verify the entire system from scratch, instead of leveraging compositionality to contain the reverification effort. In this paper, we focus on the challenge of modular verification of distributed systems with respect to high-level protocol invariants as well as for low-level implementation safety properties. We argue that the missing link between the two is a programming paradigm that would allow one to reason about both high-level distributed protocols and low-level implementation primitives in a single verification-friendly framework. Such a link would make it possible to reap the benefits from both the vast body of research in distributed computing, focused on modular protocol decomposition and consistency properties, as well as from the recent advances in program verification, enabling construction of provably correct systems implementations. To showcase the modular verification challenges, we present some typical scenarios of decomposition between a distributed protocol and its implementations. We then describe our ongoing research agenda, in which we are attempting to address the outlined problems by providing a typing discipline and a set of domain-specific primitives for specifying, implementing and verifying distributed systems. Our approach, mechanized within a proof assistant, provides the means of decomposition necessary for modular proofs about distributed protocols and systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
模块化验证分布式系统的编程语言抽象
分布式系统很少作为单片程序开发。相反,像任何软件一样,这些系统可能由多个程序组件组成,然后分别编译并连接在一起。现代系统还包含各种服务,它们相互之间以及与客户机应用程序之间相互作用。然而,最先进的验证工具主要关注于验证独立的、封闭世界的协议或系统,因此无法解释分布式系统的组成性质。例如,独立验证的缺点是,当协议及其优化实现发展时,必须从头开始重新验证整个系统,而不是利用组合性来包含验证工作。在本文中,我们关注分布式系统在高层协议不变性和低层实现安全属性方面的模块化验证的挑战。我们认为,两者之间缺失的联系是一种编程范式,该范式允许人们在单个验证友好的框架中对高级分布式协议和低级实现原语进行推理。这样的联系将使我们有可能从分布式计算的大量研究中获益,这些研究集中在模块化协议分解和一致性属性上,以及从程序验证的最新进展中获益,这使得构建可证明正确的系统实现成为可能。为了展示模块化验证的挑战,我们展示了分布式协议及其实现之间分解的一些典型场景。然后,我们描述了我们正在进行的研究议程,其中我们试图通过提供一种类型规则和一组用于指定、实现和验证分布式系统的领域特定原语来解决概述的问题。我们的方法在证明助手中机械化,为分布式协议和系统的模块化证明提供了必要的分解手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
From Theory to Systems: A Grounded Approach to Programming Language Education Linking Types for Multi-Language Software: Have Your Cake and Eat It Too AP: Artificial Programming Fission: Secure Dynamic Code-Splitting for JavaScript Migratory Typing: Ten Years Later
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1