Households’ Clean Cooking Fuel Poverty: Testing the Energy-Ladder Hypothesis in the Case of Bangladesh

T. Ahmad, K. Kiran, Amina Alamgir
{"title":"Households’ Clean Cooking Fuel Poverty: Testing the Energy-Ladder Hypothesis in the Case of Bangladesh","authors":"T. Ahmad, K. Kiran, Amina Alamgir","doi":"10.52131/jee.2023.0401.0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study explores clean cooking fuel poverty in Bangladeshi households based on the energy ladder hypothesis stating that as income increases, households switch towards cleaner cooking fuels. Data from the Bangladesh Demographic and Household Survey (BDHS) 2017-18 reveals that 20.45% of households use advanced or cleaner cooking fuels, while a majority (79.23%) still rely on primitive or traditional cooking fuels. Electricity is used by a very small percentage (0.57%), while LPG is used by a slightly higher proportion (6.96%). Biogas usage is minimal (0.11%), and a small percentage (0.03%) still relies on kerosene. Wood is the dominant fuel (46.25%), and other minor sources include charcoal (0.10%), straw/shrubs/grass (0.63%), agricultural crop residues (25.96%), and animal dung (6.39%). The results reveal that only a small proportion of households (20.45%) are classified as \"clean cooking fuel non-poor,\" indicating a limited adoption of cleaner cooking technologies in Bangladesh. Further analysis indicates a gradual increase in clean cooking fuel usage as wealth status improves. Only 0.25% of the poorest households use clean fuels, while the percentage increases to 0.68% in the \"poorer\" category, 3.92% in the \"middle\" wealth category, and 24.51% in the \"richer\" category. Among the wealthiest households, 70.64% use clean cooking fuels. The study highlights the urgent need for policymakers in Bangladesh to address clean cooking fuel poverty by implementing measures like subsidies, awareness campaigns, and infrastructure development to promote cleaner cooking technologies, thereby improving public health and environmental sustainability.","PeriodicalId":240042,"journal":{"name":"iRASD Journal of Energy & Environment","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"iRASD Journal of Energy & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52131/jee.2023.0401.0034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study explores clean cooking fuel poverty in Bangladeshi households based on the energy ladder hypothesis stating that as income increases, households switch towards cleaner cooking fuels. Data from the Bangladesh Demographic and Household Survey (BDHS) 2017-18 reveals that 20.45% of households use advanced or cleaner cooking fuels, while a majority (79.23%) still rely on primitive or traditional cooking fuels. Electricity is used by a very small percentage (0.57%), while LPG is used by a slightly higher proportion (6.96%). Biogas usage is minimal (0.11%), and a small percentage (0.03%) still relies on kerosene. Wood is the dominant fuel (46.25%), and other minor sources include charcoal (0.10%), straw/shrubs/grass (0.63%), agricultural crop residues (25.96%), and animal dung (6.39%). The results reveal that only a small proportion of households (20.45%) are classified as "clean cooking fuel non-poor," indicating a limited adoption of cleaner cooking technologies in Bangladesh. Further analysis indicates a gradual increase in clean cooking fuel usage as wealth status improves. Only 0.25% of the poorest households use clean fuels, while the percentage increases to 0.68% in the "poorer" category, 3.92% in the "middle" wealth category, and 24.51% in the "richer" category. Among the wealthiest households, 70.64% use clean cooking fuels. The study highlights the urgent need for policymakers in Bangladesh to address clean cooking fuel poverty by implementing measures like subsidies, awareness campaigns, and infrastructure development to promote cleaner cooking technologies, thereby improving public health and environmental sustainability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭清洁烹饪燃料贫困:以孟加拉国为例的能源阶梯假说检验
该研究根据能源阶梯假说探讨了孟加拉国家庭的清洁烹饪燃料贫困问题,该假说认为,随着收入的增加,家庭会转向使用更清洁的烹饪燃料。2017-18年孟加拉国人口和家庭调查(BDHS)的数据显示,20.45%的家庭使用先进或更清洁的烹饪燃料,而大多数(79.23%)仍然依赖原始或传统的烹饪燃料。使用电力的比例非常小(0.57%),而使用液化石油气的比例略高(6.96%)。沼气的使用很少(0.11%),还有一小部分(0.03%)仍然依赖煤油。木材是主要的燃料(46.25%),其他次要来源包括木炭(0.10%),秸秆/灌木/草(0.63%),农作物秸秆(25.96%)和动物粪便(6.39%)。结果显示,只有一小部分家庭(20.45%)被归类为“清洁烹饪燃料非贫困”,这表明孟加拉国采用更清洁的烹饪技术的程度有限。进一步分析表明,随着财富状况的改善,清洁烹饪燃料的使用逐渐增加。在最贫穷的家庭中,只有0.25%的家庭使用清洁燃料,而在“较贫穷”类别中,这一比例上升至0.68%,在“中等”财富类别中为3.92%,在“较富裕”类别中为24.51%。在最富裕的家庭中,70.64%的家庭使用清洁的烹饪燃料。该研究强调,孟加拉国的政策制定者迫切需要通过实施补贴、宣传活动和基础设施建设等措施来解决清洁烹饪燃料贫困问题,以推广更清洁的烹饪技术,从而改善公众健康和环境可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Electricity Power Consumption, GDP, Trade, Urban Population, Foreign Direct Investment and Renewable Energy Consumption on CO2 Emissions: Evidence from Pakistan CO2 Emissions, Health Expenditures, and Economic Growth Nexus in Pakistan How Do Nuclear and Renewable Energy Effects the Environment? A Case Study of Pakistan Households’ Clean Cooking Fuel Poverty: Testing the Energy-Ladder Hypothesis in the Case of Bangladesh The Role of Renewable Energy on the Environmental Degradation: Evidence from ASEAN Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1