Introduction: Critical Librarianship

David Ketchum
{"title":"Introduction: Critical Librarianship","authors":"David Ketchum","doi":"10.1108/s0732-067120200000041001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While critical theory has roots in the social sciences and humanities, it moves beyond attempts to merely understand and explain society, challenging individuals and institutions to critique and perhaps change the social constructs in which we live, particularly those that contribute to social injustice. More specifically, critical theory acknowledges that racism, patriarchy, capitalism, and similar systems of power and oppression have become nearly inextricable from many aspects of Western culture, largely due to centuries of dominance by white, heterosexual, Christian males. This centralization of power led to the marginalization of “others,” or those who do not belong to the dominant factions within society. Despite this, proponents of critical theory insist that ideology is the main impediment to human liberation, and liberation is achievable by interrogating and dismantling tyrannical ideologies and their effects on society. Critical theory is not new. Critical Theory as a school of thought emerged in Germany in the 1930s, and has since been applied widely and in varying contexts. As aspects of Critical Theory were more broadly adopted and applied, “critical theory” became colloquialized and critical practices embedded in many professions and activities. Examples of this include critical pedagogy, critical management, critical anthropology, and critical librarianship. The primary commonalities within these movements are a conscious effort and interest in looking reflectively at the values, practices, and structures within pedagogy, management, librarianship, etc., and changing those things that contribute to social, economic, and other injustices. Sanford Berman (born October 6, 1933) is known extensively in the library cataloging community as an activist and proponent of alternative library practices. He is perhaps most well known for his criticism of bias in Library of Congress (LOC) subject headings. In 2007, Berman submitted a formal recommendation to the LOC Cataloging Policy and Support Office to have “critical librarianship” added as a LOC subject heading. Within this proposal,","PeriodicalId":167104,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Library Administration and Organization","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Library Administration and Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/s0732-067120200000041001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While critical theory has roots in the social sciences and humanities, it moves beyond attempts to merely understand and explain society, challenging individuals and institutions to critique and perhaps change the social constructs in which we live, particularly those that contribute to social injustice. More specifically, critical theory acknowledges that racism, patriarchy, capitalism, and similar systems of power and oppression have become nearly inextricable from many aspects of Western culture, largely due to centuries of dominance by white, heterosexual, Christian males. This centralization of power led to the marginalization of “others,” or those who do not belong to the dominant factions within society. Despite this, proponents of critical theory insist that ideology is the main impediment to human liberation, and liberation is achievable by interrogating and dismantling tyrannical ideologies and their effects on society. Critical theory is not new. Critical Theory as a school of thought emerged in Germany in the 1930s, and has since been applied widely and in varying contexts. As aspects of Critical Theory were more broadly adopted and applied, “critical theory” became colloquialized and critical practices embedded in many professions and activities. Examples of this include critical pedagogy, critical management, critical anthropology, and critical librarianship. The primary commonalities within these movements are a conscious effort and interest in looking reflectively at the values, practices, and structures within pedagogy, management, librarianship, etc., and changing those things that contribute to social, economic, and other injustices. Sanford Berman (born October 6, 1933) is known extensively in the library cataloging community as an activist and proponent of alternative library practices. He is perhaps most well known for his criticism of bias in Library of Congress (LOC) subject headings. In 2007, Berman submitted a formal recommendation to the LOC Cataloging Policy and Support Office to have “critical librarianship” added as a LOC subject heading. Within this proposal,
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
导论:批判图书馆学
虽然批判理论植根于社会科学和人文科学,但它超越了仅仅理解和解释社会的尝试,挑战个人和机构来批评甚至可能改变我们生活的社会结构,特别是那些导致社会不公正的社会结构。更具体地说,批判理论承认,种族主义、父权制、资本主义以及类似的权力和压迫制度,在西方文化的许多方面已经变得几乎不可分割,这主要是由于几个世纪以来白人、异性恋和基督教男性的统治。这种权力的集中导致了“他人”或那些不属于社会主导派别的人的边缘化。尽管如此,批判理论的支持者坚持认为,意识形态是人类解放的主要障碍,解放可以通过质疑和拆除专制的意识形态及其对社会的影响来实现。批判理论并不新鲜。批判理论作为一种思想流派,于20世纪30年代在德国兴起,并在不同的背景下得到广泛应用。随着批判理论的各个方面被更广泛地采用和应用,“批判理论”变得口语化,批评实践融入了许多职业和活动中。这方面的例子包括批判教育学、批判管理学、批判人类学和批判图书馆学。这些运动的主要共同点是有意识地努力并有兴趣反思教育学、管理学、图书馆学等领域的价值观、实践和结构,并改变那些导致社会、经济和其他不公正的事情。桑福德·伯曼(Sanford Berman, 1933年10月6日-)在图书馆编目界广为人知,他是图书馆另类做法的积极分子和支持者。他最为人所知的可能是他对美国国会图书馆(LOC)主题标题偏见的批评。2007年,伯曼向LOC编目政策和支持办公室提交了一份正式建议,将“关键图书馆”作为LOC的主题标题。在这项建议中,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Building Community Engagement and Outreach in Libraries Index Moving Toward BIBFRAME and a Linked Data Environment Technical Services in the 21st Century Index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1