Evaluation of Oral Health- Related Quality of Life after Implant Treatment versus Root Canal Treatment

Golnoush Momeni, E. Rafiei, Parisa Ranjbarian, Sajad Babaei
{"title":"Evaluation of Oral Health- Related Quality of Life after Implant Treatment versus Root Canal Treatment","authors":"Golnoush Momeni, E. Rafiei, Parisa Ranjbarian, Sajad Babaei","doi":"10.18502/ijds.v18i4.12092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Preserving the natural tooth by endodontic treatment or tooth extraction and implantation is an important dilemma that requires careful evaluation of the factors that affect the final treatment and patients' quality of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of life related to oral health after single tooth implant treatment in comparison with endodontic treatment.Materials & Methods: This study is a cross-sectional analytical study to evaluate the quality of life of 80 patients referred to Isfahan Azad Dental School in 1399-1400 in two groups (endo and implant) whose anterior teeth have been endodontically treated and had also a history of anterior single tooth implant with functional crown in a recent year, with using Oral health-related quality of life questionnaire (OHIP-12). The collected data were analyzed using Shapiro-Wilk test and independent T-test with an error level of 0.05% (p value < 0.05).Results: Mean patient's oral health-related quality of life after single tooth implant and after endodontic treatment was respectively 16.95 and 16.83 and all the studied parameters were shown to be above average. There was no significant difference between the type of treatment and patient's oral health-related quality of life (p value = 0.885). There was a significant difference between patient's gender and oral health-related quality of life in implant treatment (p value = 0.036).Conclusion: The oral health-related quality of life after single tooth implant treatment was comparable to endodontic treatment in patients and it was higher than average in both treatments.","PeriodicalId":221865,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Isfahan Dental School","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Isfahan Dental School","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijds.v18i4.12092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Preserving the natural tooth by endodontic treatment or tooth extraction and implantation is an important dilemma that requires careful evaluation of the factors that affect the final treatment and patients' quality of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of life related to oral health after single tooth implant treatment in comparison with endodontic treatment.Materials & Methods: This study is a cross-sectional analytical study to evaluate the quality of life of 80 patients referred to Isfahan Azad Dental School in 1399-1400 in two groups (endo and implant) whose anterior teeth have been endodontically treated and had also a history of anterior single tooth implant with functional crown in a recent year, with using Oral health-related quality of life questionnaire (OHIP-12). The collected data were analyzed using Shapiro-Wilk test and independent T-test with an error level of 0.05% (p value < 0.05).Results: Mean patient's oral health-related quality of life after single tooth implant and after endodontic treatment was respectively 16.95 and 16.83 and all the studied parameters were shown to be above average. There was no significant difference between the type of treatment and patient's oral health-related quality of life (p value = 0.885). There was a significant difference between patient's gender and oral health-related quality of life in implant treatment (p value = 0.036).Conclusion: The oral health-related quality of life after single tooth implant treatment was comparable to endodontic treatment in patients and it was higher than average in both treatments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种植体治疗与根管治疗后口腔健康相关生活质量的评价
通过根管治疗或拔牙种植来保留天然牙是一个重要的难题,需要仔细评估影响最终治疗和患者生活质量的因素。本研究的目的是评估单牙种植治疗与根管治疗后与口腔健康相关的生活质量。材料与方法:本研究采用口腔健康相关生活质量问卷(OHIP-12),对1399-1400年在Isfahan Azad牙科学校就诊的80例前牙行根管治疗且近年有前牙单牙种植体功能冠史的患者(内嵌组和种植体组)的生活质量进行了横断面分析研究。采用Shapiro-Wilk检验和独立t检验进行分析,误差水平为0.05% (p值< 0.05)。结果:单牙种植后患者口腔健康相关生活质量均值为16.95,根管治疗后患者口腔健康相关生活质量均值为16.83,各项指标均在平均水平以上。治疗方式与患者口腔健康相关生活质量差异无统计学意义(p值= 0.885)。患者性别与种植治疗口腔健康相关生活质量差异有统计学意义(p值= 0.036)。结论:单牙种植治疗后患者口腔健康相关生活质量与根管治疗相当,且均高于平均水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Investigation of Morphological Variations of Canal and Root of First Mandibular Molar in Tomographic Images Computer with Cone Beam in Patients of Arak City Treatment of Severe Anterior Open-bite Accompany with Impacted Canine: A Case Report The Ability of Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Periodontal Tissue Regeneration: A Comprehensive Review of Literature Immunohistochemical Expression of Alpha Smooth Muscle Actin Positive Myofibroblast and Laminin 5 gamma 2 in Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Verrucous Carcinoma of the Oral Cavity Evaluation of the Relationship between rs17561 and rs1143634 Genetic Polymorphisms and the Risk of Chronic Periodontitis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1