[Longitudinal observation of condylar position in anterior crossbite at the mixed dentition during orthodontic treatment].

N Iijima, E Motegi, Y Kuboki, H Miyazaki, H Konishi, M Sebata
{"title":"[Longitudinal observation of condylar position in anterior crossbite at the mixed dentition during orthodontic treatment].","authors":"N Iijima,&nbsp;E Motegi,&nbsp;Y Kuboki,&nbsp;H Miyazaki,&nbsp;H Konishi,&nbsp;M Sebata","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We investigated the condylar position by transcranial radiography which can be put daily clinical use easily. The patients are 8 anterior crossbite at the mixed dentition (4 functional crossbite and 4 skeletal crossbite). We observed their condylar positions before treatment (average age is 9.3 years old), after correction of overbite (average age is 10.0 years old) and 3-4 years after correction of overbite (average age is 14.0 years old). The results were as follows: 1. Condylar position of 7 cases changed after correction of overbite. The differences between right and left condylar position of six in seven cases had been recognized before treatment decreased after correction of overbite. Their condylar position were stable during the observation period of 3-4 years after correction of overbite. The condylar position of the other one case closed to fossa and then relapsed 3-4 years later. 2. Condylar position of only one case hasn't changed during the observation. 3. In functional crossbite cases, there were some differences between right and left condylar position before treatment, but no differences after crossbite correction. In skeletal crossbite cases, there was no tendency of the changing on their condylar position through treatment. 4. The changing to same direction was observed in the decrease of differences on condylar position and in the result of frontal cephalogram analysis. 5. There wasn't special relationship between changing of condylar position and orthodontic appliances. 6. TMJ dysfunction was observed in the case which has significant difference in its condylar positions before treatment and in the other case in which difference was not corrected after treatment. We recognized the usefulness of transcranial radiography for orthodontic treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":76235,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai zasshi = The journal of Japan Orthodontic Society","volume":"49 3","pages":"263-75"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai zasshi = The journal of Japan Orthodontic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigated the condylar position by transcranial radiography which can be put daily clinical use easily. The patients are 8 anterior crossbite at the mixed dentition (4 functional crossbite and 4 skeletal crossbite). We observed their condylar positions before treatment (average age is 9.3 years old), after correction of overbite (average age is 10.0 years old) and 3-4 years after correction of overbite (average age is 14.0 years old). The results were as follows: 1. Condylar position of 7 cases changed after correction of overbite. The differences between right and left condylar position of six in seven cases had been recognized before treatment decreased after correction of overbite. Their condylar position were stable during the observation period of 3-4 years after correction of overbite. The condylar position of the other one case closed to fossa and then relapsed 3-4 years later. 2. Condylar position of only one case hasn't changed during the observation. 3. In functional crossbite cases, there were some differences between right and left condylar position before treatment, but no differences after crossbite correction. In skeletal crossbite cases, there was no tendency of the changing on their condylar position through treatment. 4. The changing to same direction was observed in the decrease of differences on condylar position and in the result of frontal cephalogram analysis. 5. There wasn't special relationship between changing of condylar position and orthodontic appliances. 6. TMJ dysfunction was observed in the case which has significant difference in its condylar positions before treatment and in the other case in which difference was not corrected after treatment. We recognized the usefulness of transcranial radiography for orthodontic treatment.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
正畸治疗中混合牙列前牙合髁突位置的纵向观察。
经颅x线片检查髁突位置,便于临床日常使用。混合牙列前牙合8例(功能性牙合4例,骨性牙合4例)。观察患者治疗前(平均年龄9.3岁)、覆牙矫正后(平均年龄10.0岁)、覆牙矫正后3-4年(平均年龄14.0岁)的髁突位置。实验结果如下:1.实验结果表明:复咬合矫正后髁突位置改变7例。7例患者中有6例在治疗前已发现左右髁位置差异,矫治复咬合后差异减小。在覆咬合矫正后的3 ~ 4年观察期内,髁突位置稳定。另1例髁突位置靠近窝,3-4年后复发。2. 仅有1例患者观察期间髁突位置未发生变化。3.在功能性交叉咬合病例中,治疗前左右髁位置有一定差异,矫正后无差异。骨性交叉咬合患者经治疗后髁突位置无改变的趋势。4. 在髁突位置差异的减少和额位造影分析结果中观察到相同方向的变化。5. 矫治器械与髁突位置的变化无特殊关系。6. 治疗前髁突位置有显著差异的患者观察到TMJ功能障碍,治疗后差异未纠正的患者观察到TMJ功能障碍。我们认识到经颅x线摄影对正畸治疗的有用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Effects of the localized thermal enhancement on new bone formation following mechanical expansion of the rat sagittal suture]. [A long-term study on dentofacial changes after sagittal splitting osteotomies in skeletal Class III malocclusions]. [Correlation between morphologies of mandibular vertical sections and linear measurements of the skull]. [Morphological and functional analysis of dento-orofacial complex in monozygotic twins with Duchenne type muscular dystrophy]. [The present states and considerations of orthognathic surgery in Japan. Questionnaire in department of orthodontics of university dental hospital, and department of oral surgery of university medical hospital].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1