Atlas

Emily Cantwell-Kelly, Jacob Hartley, Solenn Reeves Long, Lisa Fay
{"title":"Atlas","authors":"Emily Cantwell-Kelly, Jacob Hartley, Solenn Reeves Long, Lisa Fay","doi":"10.4000/books.septentrion.103547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper summarises and critically evaluates the case for rewilding the Tasmanian devil ( Sarcophilus harrisii) on the Australian mainland, from which it has been extinct for over 3000 years. Many potentially damaging assumptions involving the reasons for their original extinction and their ability to survive the various climatic conditions across Australia arise, and are overcome through analysis of recent scientific evidence. It is found that widespread trophic rewilding of devils could have multiple environmental and social benefits, particularly through the suppression of introduced feral cat (Felis catus) and fox (Vulpes vulpes) populations that would allow for smaller mammals to flourish and reach their potential as ecosystem engineers. However, the only project currently attempting devil rewilding (Aussie Ark in the Barrington Tops national park) urgently requires a realignment of priorities in order to reap the most benefits and lead the wider devil rewilding effort down the most sustainable path. Recommendations to the Australian Minister for the Environment are made to ensure this transpires. Abstract In this essay the quote from Pruitt and Strange’s article “ The climate change gang” will be analysed. There is much climate change denialism in public discourse, especially among conservatives such as the authors of this quote. and misrepresents","PeriodicalId":117599,"journal":{"name":"Richesses en partage au Brésil et en France","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Richesses en partage au Brésil et en France","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4000/books.septentrion.103547","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper summarises and critically evaluates the case for rewilding the Tasmanian devil ( Sarcophilus harrisii) on the Australian mainland, from which it has been extinct for over 3000 years. Many potentially damaging assumptions involving the reasons for their original extinction and their ability to survive the various climatic conditions across Australia arise, and are overcome through analysis of recent scientific evidence. It is found that widespread trophic rewilding of devils could have multiple environmental and social benefits, particularly through the suppression of introduced feral cat (Felis catus) and fox (Vulpes vulpes) populations that would allow for smaller mammals to flourish and reach their potential as ecosystem engineers. However, the only project currently attempting devil rewilding (Aussie Ark in the Barrington Tops national park) urgently requires a realignment of priorities in order to reap the most benefits and lead the wider devil rewilding effort down the most sustainable path. Recommendations to the Australian Minister for the Environment are made to ensure this transpires. Abstract In this essay the quote from Pruitt and Strange’s article “ The climate change gang” will be analysed. There is much climate change denialism in public discourse, especially among conservatives such as the authors of this quote. and misrepresents
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿特拉斯
本文总结并批判性地评估了在澳大利亚大陆重新野生塔斯马尼亚魔鬼(Sarcophilus harrisii)的情况,它已经灭绝了3000多年。许多潜在的破坏性假设涉及它们最初灭绝的原因和它们在澳大利亚各种气候条件下生存的能力,并通过对最近科学证据的分析而被克服。研究发现,广泛的野化野化可以带来多种环境和社会效益,特别是通过抑制引入的野猫(Felis catus)和狐狸(Vulpes Vulpes)种群,这将允许小型哺乳动物蓬勃发展,并发挥其作为生态系统工程师的潜力。然而,目前唯一尝试重新放养魔鬼的项目(巴林顿Tops国家公园的澳大利亚方舟)迫切需要重新调整优先事项,以获得最大的利益,并将更广泛的魔鬼放养工作引向最可持续的道路。向澳大利亚环境部长提出了建议,以确保实现这一目标。在本文中引用普鲁特和斯特兰奇的文章“气候变化团伙”将进行分析。在公共话语中有很多否认气候变化的言论,尤其是在保守派中,比如这句话的作者。和歪曲
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chapitre 3 : Économie solidaire et systèmes alimentaires alternatifs – des défis territoriaux majeurs Chapitre 2 : Nouvelle économie, création de valeur dans la ville et partage de la richesse à Lille et Belo Horizonte Bibliographie Introduction : Richesses en partage au Brésil et en France Atlas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1