Efficacy of hypnotherapy in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. A systematic review with meta-analysis

K. Markin, A. Temniy, K. V. Dnov
{"title":"Efficacy of hypnotherapy in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. A systematic review with meta-analysis","authors":"K. Markin, A. Temniy, K. V. Dnov","doi":"10.17816/nb107881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND. Hypnotherapy is one of the treatments for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). \nAIM. Meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of its use and to identify the most optimal conditions for its implementation. \nMATERIALS AND METHODS. We analyzed Scientific medical databases PubMed, EMBASE, eLibrary for the period from 2005 to 2022. Studies performed on adult samples of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of IBS on the basis of Rome IIIV with a control group were selected. Included studies were analyzed for risks of bias and publication bias. Clinical efficacy was assessed by comparing data on gastrointestinal symptoms reduction and psychological condition. A subgroup analysis was used to compare the effectiveness of group and individual hypnotherapy, as well as the number of sessions conducted. \nRESULTS. Nine studies (867 patients) were included in the final meta-analysis. Hypnotherapy was significantly more effective in reducing gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with IBS compared to controls (SMD=0.25 [95% CI 0.020.49], I2=53%, p=0.03), with positive effects persisting up to one year (SMD=0.34 [95% CI 0.070.60], p=0.01). Hypnotherapy resulted in an equalization of the psychological distress (MD=1.09 [95% CI from 1.27 to 3.44], p=0.37), but the results were not significant. Group hypnotherapy (SMD=0.35 [95% CI 0.010.70], p=0.05) and higher amount of hypnotherapy sessions during treatment (SMD=0.35 [95% CI 0.140.57], p=0.001) were more effective. \nCONCLUSION. Based on the results of this systematic review, it is fair to assume that the most effective use of hypnotherapy in patients with IBS, including those with therapy-resistant forms, is more than 7 sessions of group hypnotherapy more than once a week with a minimum session time of 45 minutes.","PeriodicalId":436189,"journal":{"name":"Neurology Bulletin","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/nb107881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND. Hypnotherapy is one of the treatments for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). AIM. Meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of its use and to identify the most optimal conditions for its implementation. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We analyzed Scientific medical databases PubMed, EMBASE, eLibrary for the period from 2005 to 2022. Studies performed on adult samples of patients with a confirmed diagnosis of IBS on the basis of Rome IIIV with a control group were selected. Included studies were analyzed for risks of bias and publication bias. Clinical efficacy was assessed by comparing data on gastrointestinal symptoms reduction and psychological condition. A subgroup analysis was used to compare the effectiveness of group and individual hypnotherapy, as well as the number of sessions conducted. RESULTS. Nine studies (867 patients) were included in the final meta-analysis. Hypnotherapy was significantly more effective in reducing gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with IBS compared to controls (SMD=0.25 [95% CI 0.020.49], I2=53%, p=0.03), with positive effects persisting up to one year (SMD=0.34 [95% CI 0.070.60], p=0.01). Hypnotherapy resulted in an equalization of the psychological distress (MD=1.09 [95% CI from 1.27 to 3.44], p=0.37), but the results were not significant. Group hypnotherapy (SMD=0.35 [95% CI 0.010.70], p=0.05) and higher amount of hypnotherapy sessions during treatment (SMD=0.35 [95% CI 0.140.57], p=0.001) were more effective. CONCLUSION. Based on the results of this systematic review, it is fair to assume that the most effective use of hypnotherapy in patients with IBS, including those with therapy-resistant forms, is more than 7 sessions of group hypnotherapy more than once a week with a minimum session time of 45 minutes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
催眠疗法治疗肠易激综合征的疗效观察。荟萃分析的系统综述
背景。催眠疗法是治疗肠易激综合征(IBS)的一种方法。的目标。荟萃分析旨在评估其使用的有效性,并确定其实施的最佳条件。材料和方法。我们分析了2005年至2022年期间的科学医学数据库PubMed, EMBASE, library。在Rome iii的基础上,对确诊为IBS的成年患者样本进行研究,并选择对照组。对纳入的研究进行偏倚风险和发表偏倚分析。通过比较胃肠道症状减轻和心理状态的数据来评估临床疗效。亚组分析用于比较团体和个人催眠治疗的有效性,以及进行的疗程数量。结果。9项研究(867例患者)被纳入最终的荟萃分析。与对照组相比,催眠疗法在减轻IBS患者胃肠道症状方面明显更有效(SMD=0.25 [95% CI 0.020.49], I2=53%, p=0.03),积极效果持续长达一年(SMD=0.34 [95% CI 0.070.60], p=0.01)。催眠治疗导致心理困扰的均衡化(MD=1.09 [95% CI从1.27到3.44],p=0.37),但结果不显著。团体催眠治疗(SMD=0.35 [95% CI 0.010.70], p=0.05)和治疗期间较高的催眠治疗次数(SMD=0.35 [95% CI 0.140.57], p=0.001)更有效。结论。基于本系统综述的结果,我们可以公平地假设,对IBS患者(包括治疗抵抗型患者)最有效的催眠治疗是每周进行7次以上的集体催眠治疗,每次至少45分钟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Psychology and psychopathology of overvalue hobby schoolshooing ideas. The case of Katerina and Yakov Phenomenological approach in psychotherapy Comparative analysis of the clinical and social characteristics of persons with organic mental disorders suffering from mental retardation who have repeatedly committed socially dangerous acts Characteristics of depression treatment in men with testosterone deficiency Spiritual orientation of the psychological rehabilitation of combatants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1