A ranking method for large scale competitions based on sample grouping

Hsiang-Ching Wang, Yi-Feng Hung, Hsiang-Hui Hung
{"title":"A ranking method for large scale competitions based on sample grouping","authors":"Hsiang-Ching Wang, Yi-Feng Hung, Hsiang-Hui Hung","doi":"10.1109/IEEM.2016.7797892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a large scale competition, the number of participants is too large to be completely reviewed by any evaluator, so dividing entire participants into several groups such that each of the evaluator reviews only a group serves as an alternative. However, in this case, an evaluator reviews and ranks only a portion of participants and the final result might be distorted. The focus of this study is on the methods of grouping participants and assignments of subgroups to evaluators. Under the assumption of not increasing the workload of evaluators, this study proposes a new method called sample ranking method, which according to simulation experiments yields better results than the commonly used ranking method.","PeriodicalId":114906,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management (IEEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEEM.2016.7797892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a large scale competition, the number of participants is too large to be completely reviewed by any evaluator, so dividing entire participants into several groups such that each of the evaluator reviews only a group serves as an alternative. However, in this case, an evaluator reviews and ranks only a portion of participants and the final result might be distorted. The focus of this study is on the methods of grouping participants and assignments of subgroups to evaluators. Under the assumption of not increasing the workload of evaluators, this study proposes a new method called sample ranking method, which according to simulation experiments yields better results than the commonly used ranking method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于样本分组的大型比赛排序方法
在大规模的比赛中,参与者的数量太大,以至于任何评估者都无法完全审查,因此将整个参与者分成几个小组,以便每个评估者只审查一个小组,这是一种替代方案。然而,在这种情况下,评价者只对一部分参与者进行审查和排名,最终结果可能会被扭曲。本研究的重点是参与者分组的方法和分组分配给评估者。在不增加评价者工作量的假设下,本研究提出了一种新的方法——样本排序法,仿真实验表明,该方法比常用的排序法效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The effect of collaborative communication, power dependency, and price satisfaction on trust and loyalty of individual farmers to dairy cooperative case study dairy supply chain in Boyolali Supply chain collaboration: A triadic view Adoption of Near Field Communication in hotel industry based on risk perspectives and individual characteristics One's fault is another's lesson: What motivates the employees to Participate in the learning activity? Internet of things value for mechanical engineers and evolving commercial product lifecycle management system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1