S51 Evaluation of treatment approaches for hospitalized Covid-19 patients

A. Kilcoyne, E. Jordan, C. Durrant, D. Chappell, O. Ahmed
{"title":"S51 Evaluation of treatment approaches for hospitalized Covid-19 patients","authors":"A. Kilcoyne, E. Jordan, C. Durrant, D. Chappell, O. Ahmed","doi":"10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundCOVID-19 has driven innovation leading to emergency use authorization of treatments that address its urgent healthcare needs. However, physicians, payers and healthcare systems are challenged to select among these novel treatments for both effectiveness and value. Reliance on change in relative, rather than absolute, risk often makes discrimination of treatment effects between medications impractical, with potentially misleading conclusions. Number Needed to Treat (NNT), the reciprocal of the Absolute Risk Reduction, can be a valuable alternative in assessing benefit:risk. The objective of the current analysis was to calculate NNT for reported endpoints of COVID-19 treatments.MethodsClinical information was captured from published literature and pre-prints from investigations of COVID-19 treatments. NNTs were calculated for reported endpoints. Outpatient treatments to reduce viral load included neutralizing antibody ‘cocktails’ REGN-COV21 and bamlanivimab/etesevimab.2 Inpatient treatments included the anti-viral: remdesivir 3,4;and immune modulators: baricitinib5, and lenzilumab.6ResultsREGN-COV2 reduced the number of medically attended visits with NNT of 33.3. The NNT for hospitalization or death was 20 for bamlanivimab/etesevimab. NNTs for 28-day mortality with inpatient treatment were 37 for baricitinib, 26.3 for remdesivir alone, and 22.7 for lenzilumab. Additional analyses of lenzilumab resulted in NNT of 14.7 when combined with remdesivir and corticosteroids, 15.4 when combined with remdesivir, and 13.9 in patients with baseline CRP<150mg/L and age<85 years. The NNT for lenzilumab to prevent survival without ventilation (SWOV) was 15.4 which, decreased to 6.4 in patients with baseline CRP<150mg/L and age<85 years. The number needed to prevent a serious adverse event was 20 for baricitinib, 15 for remdesivir, and 20.4 for lenzilumab.ConclusionThe NNT for COVID-19 treatments varied with setting, endpoint, and mechanism. The NNT for lenzilumab improved with refinement of concomitant medications and patient phenotype. NNT provides a simple measure for comparative analyses that helps inform clinical decision-making and resource allocation.ReferencesWeinreich, et al. N Engl J Med 2021;384:238–51.Gottlieb, et al. JAMA 2021;325:632–44.Garibaldi, et al. JAMA NetwOpen 2021;4:e213071.Beigel, et al. N Engl J Med 2020;383:1813–26.Kalil, et al. N Engl J Med 2020.Temesgen, et al. medRxiv 2021.","PeriodicalId":114929,"journal":{"name":"Developing treatments for COVID-19","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developing treatments for COVID-19","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/thorax-2021-btsabstracts.57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundCOVID-19 has driven innovation leading to emergency use authorization of treatments that address its urgent healthcare needs. However, physicians, payers and healthcare systems are challenged to select among these novel treatments for both effectiveness and value. Reliance on change in relative, rather than absolute, risk often makes discrimination of treatment effects between medications impractical, with potentially misleading conclusions. Number Needed to Treat (NNT), the reciprocal of the Absolute Risk Reduction, can be a valuable alternative in assessing benefit:risk. The objective of the current analysis was to calculate NNT for reported endpoints of COVID-19 treatments.MethodsClinical information was captured from published literature and pre-prints from investigations of COVID-19 treatments. NNTs were calculated for reported endpoints. Outpatient treatments to reduce viral load included neutralizing antibody ‘cocktails’ REGN-COV21 and bamlanivimab/etesevimab.2 Inpatient treatments included the anti-viral: remdesivir 3,4;and immune modulators: baricitinib5, and lenzilumab.6ResultsREGN-COV2 reduced the number of medically attended visits with NNT of 33.3. The NNT for hospitalization or death was 20 for bamlanivimab/etesevimab. NNTs for 28-day mortality with inpatient treatment were 37 for baricitinib, 26.3 for remdesivir alone, and 22.7 for lenzilumab. Additional analyses of lenzilumab resulted in NNT of 14.7 when combined with remdesivir and corticosteroids, 15.4 when combined with remdesivir, and 13.9 in patients with baseline CRP<150mg/L and age<85 years. The NNT for lenzilumab to prevent survival without ventilation (SWOV) was 15.4 which, decreased to 6.4 in patients with baseline CRP<150mg/L and age<85 years. The number needed to prevent a serious adverse event was 20 for baricitinib, 15 for remdesivir, and 20.4 for lenzilumab.ConclusionThe NNT for COVID-19 treatments varied with setting, endpoint, and mechanism. The NNT for lenzilumab improved with refinement of concomitant medications and patient phenotype. NNT provides a simple measure for comparative analyses that helps inform clinical decision-making and resource allocation.ReferencesWeinreich, et al. N Engl J Med 2021;384:238–51.Gottlieb, et al. JAMA 2021;325:632–44.Garibaldi, et al. JAMA NetwOpen 2021;4:e213071.Beigel, et al. N Engl J Med 2020;383:1813–26.Kalil, et al. N Engl J Med 2020.Temesgen, et al. medRxiv 2021.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
S51新冠肺炎住院患者治疗方法评价
covid -19推动了创新,导致紧急使用治疗授权,以满足其紧急医疗保健需求。然而,医生、支付方和医疗保健系统都面临着在这些新型治疗方法中选择有效性和价值的挑战。依赖于相对风险的变化,而不是绝对风险,往往使区分不同药物的治疗效果变得不切实际,并可能产生误导性的结论。治疗所需数量(NNT)是绝对风险降低的倒数,可以作为评估获益风险的一个有价值的替代方法。当前分析的目的是计算报告的COVID-19治疗终点的NNT。方法从COVID-19治疗调查的已发表文献和预印本中获取临床信息。计算报告终点的nnt。减少病毒载量的门诊治疗包括中和抗体“鸡尾酒”REGN-COV21和bamlanivimab/etesevimab住院治疗包括抗病毒药物remdesivir 3,4和免疫调节剂baricitinib5和lenzilumab。结果regn - cov2使NNT患者就诊次数减少了33.3次。bamlanivimab/etesevimab的住院或死亡NNT为20。住院治疗后28天死亡率的NNTs分别为巴西替尼组37、瑞德西韦组26.3和伦齐单抗组22.7。lenzilumab与瑞德西韦和皮质类固醇联合使用时,NNT为14.7,与瑞德西韦联合使用时为15.4,基线CRP<150mg/L且年龄<85岁的患者为13.9。lenzilumab预防无通气生存(SWOV)的NNT为15.4,在基线CRP<150mg/L且年龄<85岁的患者中降至6.4。预防严重不良事件所需的数量为baricitinib 20个,remdesivir 15个,lenzilumab 20.4个。结论NNT治疗COVID-19的效果随治疗地点、终点和机制的不同而不同。lenzilumab的NNT随着伴随药物和患者表型的改进而改善。NNT提供了一种简单的比较分析方法,有助于为临床决策和资源分配提供信息。参考文献weinreich等。中华检验医学杂志(英文版);2013;31(4):391 - 391。戈特利布等人。《美国医学会杂志》2021;325:632-44。加里波第等。中国生物医学工程学报(英文版);2011;31(4):561 - 561。Beigel等人。中国生物医学工程杂志(英文版);2009;31(3):391 - 391。Kalil等人。中华医学杂志,2020。Temesgen, et al. medRxiv 2021。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
S48 Lenzilumab efficacy and safety in newly hospitalized Covid-19 subjects: results from the LIVE-AIR phase 3 randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial S50 A randomised clinical trial of azithromycin versus standard care in ambulatory COVID-19 – the ATOMIC2 trial S49 C-reactive protein as a biomarker for improved efficacy of lenzilumab in Covid-19 patients: results from the LIVE-AIR trial S51 Evaluation of treatment approaches for hospitalized Covid-19 patients S53 Impact of empirical antibiotic use in patients with COVID-19 on morbidity and mortality during the first and second UK SARS-CoV-2 waves
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1