Notas sobre mediação, conciliação e as funções da advocacia pública: uma perspectiva à luz do direito administrativo contemporâneo

Flavio García
{"title":"Notas sobre mediação, conciliação e as funções da advocacia pública: uma perspectiva à luz do direito administrativo contemporâneo","authors":"Flavio García","doi":"10.52028/rpgmnit.v1i1.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article adresses how alternative dispute resolution gained ground in Contemporary Administrative Law, especially in the scope of action of Public Advocacy. The article notes that the administrative proceeding has not, in the last decades, assumed the role it deserved in the resolution of conflicts, being replaced by the excessive judicialization of these demands. There is, however, a change in the attitude of Public Advocacy with the valuation of consensuality and the perception that they must play an important role in conflict mediation, avoiding the unnecessary judicialization of the demand. The article shows how mediation and conciliation have played an important role in the prevention and resolution of conflicts with the Public Administration, and helped Public Advocacy to develop a proactive role, focused on preventive advocacy.","PeriodicalId":346094,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Procuradoria Geral do Município de Niterói","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Procuradoria Geral do Município de Niterói","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52028/rpgmnit.v1i1.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article adresses how alternative dispute resolution gained ground in Contemporary Administrative Law, especially in the scope of action of Public Advocacy. The article notes that the administrative proceeding has not, in the last decades, assumed the role it deserved in the resolution of conflicts, being replaced by the excessive judicialization of these demands. There is, however, a change in the attitude of Public Advocacy with the valuation of consensuality and the perception that they must play an important role in conflict mediation, avoiding the unnecessary judicialization of the demand. The article shows how mediation and conciliation have played an important role in the prevention and resolution of conflicts with the Public Administration, and helped Public Advocacy to develop a proactive role, focused on preventive advocacy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调解、调解与公共法律职能注释:当代行政法视角
本文论述了替代性争端解决在当代行政法中,特别是在公共倡导行动的范围内是如何取得进展的。文章指出,在过去几十年中,行政程序在解决冲突方面没有发挥应有的作用,取而代之的是对这些要求的过度司法化。然而,公众倡导组织的态度发生了变化,它重视协商一致意见,认为它们必须在冲突调解中发挥重要作用,避免不必要地将要求司法化。文章展示了调解和和解如何在预防和解决与公共行政的冲突中发挥重要作用,并帮助公共倡导发挥积极主动的作用,侧重于预防性倡导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Incompletude em contratos de concessão: ainda a teoria da imprevisão?* Procedimentos probatórios autônomos como instrumentos de acertamento fático e fomento ao consenso – breve análise das inovações trazidas pelo art. 381 do novo Código de Processo Civil Dever de agir e precaução: uma análise à luz da tese fixada no julgamento de constitucionalidade da MP nº 966/2020 pelo STF Direito em tempos de crise: o que as contratações públicas podem aprender com a pandemia de COVID-19 O exercício das funções da advocacia pública como atividade exclusiva dos advogados públicos efetivos: uma releitura da Proposta de Súmula Vinculante nº 18 do STF à luz dos dados publicados no 1º Diagnóstico de Advocacia Pública Municipal no Brasil (2019)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1