TAIWAN CRISIS ANALYSIS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF «BARGAINING OF WAR THEORY»

D. Grafov
{"title":"TAIWAN CRISIS ANALYSIS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF «BARGAINING OF WAR THEORY»","authors":"D. Grafov","doi":"10.31696/2618-7302-2023-2-037-053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the consequences for China of the forceful reunification of Taiwan and to assess the acceptability of these consequences for Beijing authorities. The choice to conquer or not to conquer Taiwan is discussed from the perspective of the Bargaining Model of War that based on an assessment of the benefits costs ratio. The evaluation of the decision cost definitely depends on the perception of the rival’s actions and other external and internal variables. Each side evaluates more optimistic its own benefit-cost ratio and tries to shift the other side coast of war perception in order to change the decision to fight. The author comes to the conclusion that, on the one hand, the benefits-costs ratio is not favorable for Chinese authorities and they are not going to occupy Taiwan in current moment. But, on the other hand, China uses the threat to Taiwan as a lever in bargaining or deterring the United States. Also, the threat is used by Beijing for a pessimistic impact to the benefits-costs assessment in the event of Taiwan’s refusal to reunite and follow «Consensus 1992».","PeriodicalId":373435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Institute of Oriental Studies RAS","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Institute of Oriental Studies RAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31696/2618-7302-2023-2-037-053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the consequences for China of the forceful reunification of Taiwan and to assess the acceptability of these consequences for Beijing authorities. The choice to conquer or not to conquer Taiwan is discussed from the perspective of the Bargaining Model of War that based on an assessment of the benefits costs ratio. The evaluation of the decision cost definitely depends on the perception of the rival’s actions and other external and internal variables. Each side evaluates more optimistic its own benefit-cost ratio and tries to shift the other side coast of war perception in order to change the decision to fight. The author comes to the conclusion that, on the one hand, the benefits-costs ratio is not favorable for Chinese authorities and they are not going to occupy Taiwan in current moment. But, on the other hand, China uses the threat to Taiwan as a lever in bargaining or deterring the United States. Also, the threat is used by Beijing for a pessimistic impact to the benefits-costs assessment in the event of Taiwan’s refusal to reunite and follow «Consensus 1992».
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“战争讨价还价理论”视角下的台湾危机分析
本文分析了台湾强行统一对中国的影响,并评估了北京当局对这些后果的接受程度。本文从基于收益成本比评估的战争讨价还价模型的视角,探讨了征服台湾与不征服台湾的选择。决策成本的评估肯定取决于对竞争对手行为的感知以及其他外部和内部变量。双方都对自己的收益成本比进行了较为乐观的评估,并试图转移对方的战争感知海岸,以改变作战决策。作者的结论是,一方面,收益成本比对中国当局不利,他们目前不打算占领台湾。但是,另一方面,中国利用对台湾的威胁作为讨价还价或威慑美国的杠杆。此外,北京利用这一威胁对台湾拒绝统一和遵循“九二共识”的情况下的收益-成本评估产生悲观影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE RADICALIZATION OF JAPAN’S POLICY IN THE SHOWA PERIOD ON THE EVE OF THE MANCHURIAN INCIDENT OF 1931 CHINESE MANAGEMENT STYLE: CROSS-CULTURAL INTEGRATION THE FIRST KING’ S SONS OF KUSH AND THEIR PREDECESSORS ORNAMENTAL DECORATION OF THE EARLY CHRISTIAN MAUSOLEUM CHAPEL OF EXODUS (KHARGA OASIS, EGYPT): ROLE, CONNOTATIONS, DATING O̅TA GYU̅ICHI. «SHINCHŌ-KŌ KI». BOOK XIII (RUSSIAN TRANSLATION WITH COMMENTS). PART I
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1