Online Sexual Grooming: A Critical Analysis on Section 4 of The Computer Misuse Act 2007 and Section 377g of The Brunei Penal Code 1957

AR-RĀ’IQ Pub Date : 2020-12-01 DOI:10.59202/riq.v3i2.437
Azilla Liyana binti Mohd Azam Zaki
{"title":"Online Sexual Grooming: A Critical Analysis on Section 4 of The Computer Misuse Act 2007 and Section 377g of The Brunei Penal Code 1957","authors":"Azilla Liyana binti Mohd Azam Zaki","doi":"10.59202/riq.v3i2.437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Brunei Computer Misuse Act 2007, Chapter 194 is a vital instrument in tackling cybercrime in the country. Section 4 of the respective Act allows punishment on any misusers of technology who access with intent to commit or facilitate commission of offence. This particular provision has been reiterated in a number of Bruneian computer related cases, usually associated with the Brunei Penal Code 1957, Chapter 22. In 2015, the provision on sexual grooming was imposed in reflection of the growing trend of this nature of offence, especially its commission through technology. Section 377G of the Brunei Penal Code was introduced to protect minors from adult sex predators. Although the purpose of this provision was to combat sexual grooming offences committed through technology, it does not specifically state on the technology aspect of the crime. Does this mean, like other conventional crimes, such as theft and fraud, the Brunei Computer Misuse Act will take place when a technology is involved in the commission of crime? This paper uses the doctrinal approach and has chosen Singapore for its comparative study. It seeks to examine the Brunei Computer Misuse Act 2007, Chapter 194 and the Singapore Computer Misuse Act 1993, Chapter 50A, the Brunei Penal Code 1957, Chapter 22 and the Singapore Penal Code 1871, Chapter 224, commentary judgments and principles, and whether Section 4 of the Brunei Computer Misuse Act can be imposed in a sexual grooming offence.","PeriodicalId":252295,"journal":{"name":"AR-RĀ’IQ","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AR-RĀ’IQ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59202/riq.v3i2.437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Brunei Computer Misuse Act 2007, Chapter 194 is a vital instrument in tackling cybercrime in the country. Section 4 of the respective Act allows punishment on any misusers of technology who access with intent to commit or facilitate commission of offence. This particular provision has been reiterated in a number of Bruneian computer related cases, usually associated with the Brunei Penal Code 1957, Chapter 22. In 2015, the provision on sexual grooming was imposed in reflection of the growing trend of this nature of offence, especially its commission through technology. Section 377G of the Brunei Penal Code was introduced to protect minors from adult sex predators. Although the purpose of this provision was to combat sexual grooming offences committed through technology, it does not specifically state on the technology aspect of the crime. Does this mean, like other conventional crimes, such as theft and fraud, the Brunei Computer Misuse Act will take place when a technology is involved in the commission of crime? This paper uses the doctrinal approach and has chosen Singapore for its comparative study. It seeks to examine the Brunei Computer Misuse Act 2007, Chapter 194 and the Singapore Computer Misuse Act 1993, Chapter 50A, the Brunei Penal Code 1957, Chapter 22 and the Singapore Penal Code 1871, Chapter 224, commentary judgments and principles, and whether Section 4 of the Brunei Computer Misuse Act can be imposed in a sexual grooming offence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线性引诱:对2007年计算机滥用法案第4节和1957年文莱刑法典第377g节的批判性分析
2007年汶莱电脑滥用法令第194章,是处理国内网路犯罪的重要工具。相关法案的第4条允许对任何意图实施或促进犯罪的技术滥用者进行惩罚。这一特别规定在一些与文莱计算机有关的案件中得到重申,这些案件通常与《1957年文莱刑法典》第22章有关。2015年,针对性引诱的规定出台,反映了这类犯罪的增长趋势,尤其是通过技术手段实施的犯罪。引入文莱刑法第377G条是为了保护未成年人免受成年性侵犯者的侵害。虽然这条规定的目的是打击通过技术手段实施的性引诱罪行,但它并没有具体说明犯罪的技术方面。这是否意味着,汶莱电脑滥用法案会像其他传统罪行,例如盗窃和诈骗一样,在涉及技术犯罪时也会生效?本文采用理论方法,选择新加坡作为比较研究对象。它旨在审查2007年文莱计算机滥用法第194章和1993年新加坡计算机滥用法第50A章,1957年文莱刑法典第22章和1871年新加坡刑法典第224章,评论判决和原则,以及文莱计算机滥用法第4节是否可以在性引诱犯罪中施加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
BOOK REVIEW HUMAN CAPITAL AND DEVELOPMENT Analisis Kebebasan Beragama Menurut Perkara 14 Convention on The Rights of The Child dan Undang-Undang Brunei Darussalam ARBITRATION AT MUSLIM RELIGIOUS COMMITTEE COUNCILS IN SOUTHERN THAILAND الإسناد عند علماء القراءات- مفهومه وأقسامه KAJIAN PEMAHAMAN AL-QARD & AL-DAYN DI KALANGAN PELAJAR-PELAJAR DI PERINGKAT INSTITUT PENGAJIAN TINGGI DI DAERAH BRUNEI & MUARA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1