Science communication herstories: reflecting on the Greek feminist birth control movement of the 1970s and 1980s

Evangelia Chordaki
{"title":"Science communication herstories: reflecting on the Greek feminist birth control movement of the 1970s and 1980s","authors":"Evangelia Chordaki","doi":"10.14324/rfa.06.1.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nFor decades, science communication has been occupied with the discussion regarding democracy, equality, equity, inclusion, participation, and engagement in knowledge production and circulation processes and practices. As a continuously flourishing field, its scope has been expanded recently towards the intertwinement, interaction and intersection of the public presence of science, gender and sexuality. This paper aims to contribute to this ongoing discussion, addressing theoretical, methodological and ethical concerns that I faced when conducting research about the sociopolitical aspects of (dis)appearance of knowledge and the multiple communication practices in the case of the Greek feminist birth control movement in the 1970s and 1980s. More specifically, I draw attention to the following points: (1) the question of atypical archives; (2) the question of the concept of the public; and (3) the question of boundaries. Science communication can happen in unexpected places, especially when it is generated by marginalised social groups. The issues addressed indicate the theoretical and methodological awareness needed, and the related possibilities for prioritising inclusion and diversity in science communication. This focus could reveal the rich content of science communication as a social practice, offering tools for tracing invisible or lost herstories of production and circulation of knowledge from a historical perspective.","PeriodicalId":165758,"journal":{"name":"Research for All","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research for All","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14324/rfa.06.1.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For decades, science communication has been occupied with the discussion regarding democracy, equality, equity, inclusion, participation, and engagement in knowledge production and circulation processes and practices. As a continuously flourishing field, its scope has been expanded recently towards the intertwinement, interaction and intersection of the public presence of science, gender and sexuality. This paper aims to contribute to this ongoing discussion, addressing theoretical, methodological and ethical concerns that I faced when conducting research about the sociopolitical aspects of (dis)appearance of knowledge and the multiple communication practices in the case of the Greek feminist birth control movement in the 1970s and 1980s. More specifically, I draw attention to the following points: (1) the question of atypical archives; (2) the question of the concept of the public; and (3) the question of boundaries. Science communication can happen in unexpected places, especially when it is generated by marginalised social groups. The issues addressed indicate the theoretical and methodological awareness needed, and the related possibilities for prioritising inclusion and diversity in science communication. This focus could reveal the rich content of science communication as a social practice, offering tools for tracing invisible or lost herstories of production and circulation of knowledge from a historical perspective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
科学传播的历史:对20世纪70年代和80年代希腊女性主义节育运动的反思
几十年来,科学传播一直被关于知识生产和流通过程与实践中的民主、平等、公平、包容、参与和参与的讨论所占据。作为一个不断蓬勃发展的领域,它的范围最近已经扩展到科学,性别和性的公共存在的交织,互动和交叉。本文旨在为这一正在进行的讨论做出贡献,解决我在进行关于知识(消失)外观的社会政治方面的研究时所面临的理论、方法和伦理问题,以及在20世纪70年代和80年代希腊女权主义生育控制运动中多重传播实践的情况。更具体地说,我提请注意以下几点:(1)非典型档案问题;(2)公众观念问题;(3)边界问题。科学传播可以发生在意想不到的地方,特别是当它由边缘化的社会群体产生时。所讨论的问题表明了需要的理论和方法意识,以及在科学传播中优先考虑包容性和多样性的相关可能性。这种关注可以揭示作为一种社会实践的科学传播的丰富内容,为从历史的角度追踪不可见或丢失的知识生产和流通的历史故事提供工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Stakeholder-engaged research: a multidisciplinary historical analysis A co-design exemplar: how to align with community goals when developing data collection methods with communities from refugee backgrounds Delivering citizen science online and hybrid: impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on recruitment and engagement Virtual Maths Circles: helping young people to think like researchers Virtual Maths Circles: helping young people to think like researchers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1