{"title":"Reliability of the assessment of impairments and disabilities in survey research in the field of physical therapy.","authors":"E F van Triet, J Dekker, J J Kerssens, E C Curfs","doi":"10.3109/03790799009166252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>to evaluate the reliability of diagnostic assessment based on clinical observations by physical therapists.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>interobserver studies between two pairs of physical therapists.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>two primary-care physical therapy practices.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>all applying to the practices for treatment.</p><p><strong>Exclusions: </strong>physical therapy in previous 3 months, or need for acute treatment.</p><p><strong>Assessments: </strong>schedule derived from the ICIDH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>agreement on disabilities better than on impairments, the latter revealing problems particularly with pain and restricted range of motion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>reliability of assessments of most of the categories considered was reliable; in two categories the reliability was poor, and the categories were modified.</p>","PeriodicalId":77547,"journal":{"name":"International disability studies","volume":"12 2","pages":"61-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/03790799009166252","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International disability studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/03790799009166252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25
Abstract
Objective: to evaluate the reliability of diagnostic assessment based on clinical observations by physical therapists.
Design: interobserver studies between two pairs of physical therapists.
Setting: two primary-care physical therapy practices.
Patients: all applying to the practices for treatment.
Exclusions: physical therapy in previous 3 months, or need for acute treatment.
Assessments: schedule derived from the ICIDH.
Results: agreement on disabilities better than on impairments, the latter revealing problems particularly with pain and restricted range of motion.
Conclusions: reliability of assessments of most of the categories considered was reliable; in two categories the reliability was poor, and the categories were modified.