A conceptual framework for integrating six‐sigma and strategic management methodologies to quantify decision making

Shawnta S. Friday-Stroud, J. S. Sutterfield
{"title":"A conceptual framework for integrating six‐sigma and strategic management methodologies to quantify decision making","authors":"Shawnta S. Friday-Stroud, J. S. Sutterfield","doi":"10.1108/09544780710828412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present a conceptual framework for merging the strategic management process, the managerial decision‐making process and the six‐sigma process into a single, unified decision model.Design/methodology/approach – The methodology involves each of the three decision‐making processes, noting their similarities and differences, and arguing from the similarities that a single unified model will result in superior decisions.Findings – The findings were that a single, unified model is possible and the resulting model is presented in the paper.Research limitations/implications – Since this research results in a conceptual model only, it remains to be tested in actual practice. This testing is intended for a later paper.Practical implications – If the testing of the model in practice results in superior decisions, the practical implications of the paper would be use of the Friday‐Stroud/Sutterfield model in practice for better management decisions.Originality/value – The pape...","PeriodicalId":412605,"journal":{"name":"The Tqm Magazine","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"43","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Tqm Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/09544780710828412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to present a conceptual framework for merging the strategic management process, the managerial decision‐making process and the six‐sigma process into a single, unified decision model.Design/methodology/approach – The methodology involves each of the three decision‐making processes, noting their similarities and differences, and arguing from the similarities that a single unified model will result in superior decisions.Findings – The findings were that a single, unified model is possible and the resulting model is presented in the paper.Research limitations/implications – Since this research results in a conceptual model only, it remains to be tested in actual practice. This testing is intended for a later paper.Practical implications – If the testing of the model in practice results in superior decisions, the practical implications of the paper would be use of the Friday‐Stroud/Sutterfield model in practice for better management decisions.Originality/value – The pape...
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个整合六西格玛和战略管理方法来量化决策的概念框架
目的-本文的目的是提出一个概念框架,将战略管理过程、管理决策过程和六西格玛过程合并为一个单一的、统一的决策模型。设计/方法论/方法-方法论涉及三个决策过程中的每一个,注意它们的异同,并从相似之处论证单一统一模型将产生更好的决策。研究结果-研究结果是,一个单一的,统一的模型是可能的,并在论文中提出了最终的模型。研究局限性/启示-由于本研究仅得出一个概念模型,因此仍需在实际实践中进行测试。这个测试是为后面的论文准备的。实际意义-如果在实践中对模型的测试产生了更好的决策,那么本文的实际意义将是在实践中使用Friday - Stroud/Sutterfield模型来做出更好的管理决策。原创性/价值-纸张…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The International Handbook on Innovation A new framework for managing change The validity of quality practices on performance of outsourced professional housing services EFQM model self‐assessment using a questionnaire approach in university administrative services Lean Six Sigma Statistics: Calculating Process Efficiencies in Transactional Projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1