Defining metrics for scenario-based evaluation of autonomous vehicle models

Peter Farkaš, Lászlo Szőke, S. Aradi
{"title":"Defining metrics for scenario-based evaluation of autonomous vehicle models","authors":"Peter Farkaš, Lászlo Szőke, S. Aradi","doi":"10.1109/CogMob55547.2022.10117768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper deals with the evaluation of autonomous vehicles along with the quantification of their behavior and maneuvers. The article outlines the positive aspects of autonomy and lists several arguments in their favor, e.g. convenience and efficiency considerations. Furthermore, it also addresses the associated difficulties including the feasibility of road testing and the establishment of appropriate simulations. The current work aims to define methods providing objective indicators to compare algorithms solving the complex tasks of road transport. Rule-based, supervised and reinforcement learning control models, test environments, accelerated test methods and assessment indicators of the corresponding literature are reviewed and evaluated. After investigating the different metrics, we formulate an evaluation framework that can be applied in the development and assessment process of new artificial intelligence controlled models. As an outcome of this work, we aim to aid a missing sector in the field of autonomous driving function development by collecting and defining metrics that intend to help qualitatively evaluate and compare algorithms. The key aspect during the definition of the suggested method was to ensure its extensive applicability by selecting only metrics that can be obtained from the already installed sensors of the vehicles. Additionally, we also assess multiple agents to observe how their behavior compares and whether the proposed metrics reflect the expected behavior.","PeriodicalId":430975,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE 1st International Conference on Cognitive Mobility (CogMob)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE 1st International Conference on Cognitive Mobility (CogMob)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CogMob55547.2022.10117768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper deals with the evaluation of autonomous vehicles along with the quantification of their behavior and maneuvers. The article outlines the positive aspects of autonomy and lists several arguments in their favor, e.g. convenience and efficiency considerations. Furthermore, it also addresses the associated difficulties including the feasibility of road testing and the establishment of appropriate simulations. The current work aims to define methods providing objective indicators to compare algorithms solving the complex tasks of road transport. Rule-based, supervised and reinforcement learning control models, test environments, accelerated test methods and assessment indicators of the corresponding literature are reviewed and evaluated. After investigating the different metrics, we formulate an evaluation framework that can be applied in the development and assessment process of new artificial intelligence controlled models. As an outcome of this work, we aim to aid a missing sector in the field of autonomous driving function development by collecting and defining metrics that intend to help qualitatively evaluate and compare algorithms. The key aspect during the definition of the suggested method was to ensure its extensive applicability by selecting only metrics that can be obtained from the already installed sensors of the vehicles. Additionally, we also assess multiple agents to observe how their behavior compares and whether the proposed metrics reflect the expected behavior.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
定义基于场景的自动驾驶汽车模型评估指标
本文研究了自动驾驶汽车的评价及其行为和机动的量化。文章概述了自主的积极方面,并列出了一些有利于他们的论点,例如便利和效率方面的考虑。此外,它还解决了相关的困难,包括道路测试的可行性和建立适当的模拟。目前的工作旨在定义提供客观指标的方法,以比较解决道路运输复杂任务的算法。对相应文献的基于规则学习、监督学习和强化学习控制模型、测试环境、加速测试方法和评估指标进行了综述和评价。在研究了不同的度量标准之后,我们制定了一个评估框架,可以应用于新的人工智能控制模型的开发和评估过程。作为这项工作的结果,我们的目标是通过收集和定义旨在帮助定性评估和比较算法的指标来帮助自动驾驶功能开发领域缺失的部门。在定义所建议的方法时,关键的方面是通过只选择可以从已安装的车辆传感器中获得的指标来确保其广泛的适用性。此外,我们还评估了多个代理,以观察它们的行为如何比较,以及提议的指标是否反映了预期的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Transformation domain requirements specification into computation tree logic language Closer-to-reality artificial ageing of engine oils with implemented nitration Downloading modern vehicles data for Forensics examination - A case study Two state dual loop EGR engine model Temperature Prediction of Automotive Battery Systems under Realistic Driving Conditions using Artificial Neural Networks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1