Alignment Conservativity Under the Ontology Change

Yahia Atig, Ahmed Zahaf, D. Bouchiha, M. Malki
{"title":"Alignment Conservativity Under the Ontology Change","authors":"Yahia Atig, Ahmed Zahaf, D. Bouchiha, M. Malki","doi":"10.4018/jitr.299923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, many methods have appeared to solve the problem of the evolution of alignment under the change of ontologies. The main challenge for them is to maintain consistency of alignment after applying the change. An alignment is consistent if and only if the ontologies remain consistent even when used in conjunction with the alignment. The objective of this work is to take a step forward by considering the alignment evolution according to the conservativity principle under the change of ontologies. In this context, an alignment is conservative if the ontological change should not introduce new semantic relationships between concepts from one of the input ontologies. We give methods for the conservativity violation detection and repair under the change of ontologies and we carry out an experiment on a dataset adapted from the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative. The experiment demonstrates both the practical applicability of the proposed approach and shows the limits of the alignment evolution methods compared to the alignment conservativity under the change of ontologies.","PeriodicalId":296080,"journal":{"name":"J. Inf. Technol. Res.","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Inf. Technol. Res.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/jitr.299923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Recently, many methods have appeared to solve the problem of the evolution of alignment under the change of ontologies. The main challenge for them is to maintain consistency of alignment after applying the change. An alignment is consistent if and only if the ontologies remain consistent even when used in conjunction with the alignment. The objective of this work is to take a step forward by considering the alignment evolution according to the conservativity principle under the change of ontologies. In this context, an alignment is conservative if the ontological change should not introduce new semantic relationships between concepts from one of the input ontologies. We give methods for the conservativity violation detection and repair under the change of ontologies and we carry out an experiment on a dataset adapted from the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative. The experiment demonstrates both the practical applicability of the proposed approach and shows the limits of the alignment evolution methods compared to the alignment conservativity under the change of ontologies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
本体变化下的对齐保守性
近年来,出现了许多解决本体变化下对齐演化问题的方法。他们面临的主要挑战是在应用变更之后保持对齐的一致性。当且仅当本体与对齐结合使用时保持一致时,对齐才是一致的。本工作的目的是通过考虑本体论变化下的保守性原理的对齐演化,向前迈进一步。在这种情况下,如果本体论的更改不应该在其中一个输入本体论的概念之间引入新的语义关系,则对齐是保守的。给出了本体变化下的保守性冲突检测和修复方法,并在本体对齐评价倡议的数据集上进行了实验。实验证明了该方法的实用性,同时也表明了在本体变化情况下,与对准保守性相比,对准进化方法的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Benchmarking Serverless Computing: Performance and Usability MAC Protocol Analysis for Wireless Sensor Networks Prognostic Model for the Risk of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Using Fuzzy Logic Modeling Evaluation of Teachers' Innovation and Entrepreneurship Ability in Universities Based on Artificial Neural Networks Cluster-Based Vehicle Routing on Road Segments in Dematerialised Traffic Infrastructures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1