“By Faith Alone”: New Religions, Cult Experts, and the Media

Thomas J. Ward
{"title":"“By Faith Alone”: New Religions, Cult Experts, and the Media","authors":"Thomas J. Ward","doi":"10.33422/3rd.iacrss.2021.06.84","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": An expert in Buddhism, Islam, or Christianity has pored over the original or the earliest available texts of the religion that she strives to understand. Adherent to the religion in question or not, the expert has respectfully and objectively tried to observe its application in the lives of the faithful, in its rituals, and practices. She appreciates and can articulate how that religious tradition has impacted on the cultural milieu. She can address its evolution, its highs and its lows. While clear standards exist for identifying an authority on any of the world’s major religions, today’s media largely relies on disparate criteria in their coverage of new religions. Journalists remain largely reliant on personalities who lack appropriate academic training. The “expertise” of some of media’s main sources stems from a questionable narrative that stereotypes and marginalizes millions, denying their religiosity and assessing them based on criteria that could equally be applied to mainstream religions and, yet, for the time being, are not. Few of the individuals making inchoate, often alarmist assertions about new religious movements have any advanced academic training in religion whatsoever. Some alleged authorities cited by the press have no university-level training at all. While today’s media professionals are commendably cautious in reporting on incidents involving race, religion, or ethnicity, they lack such deference in their coverage of new religions. Today’s media leaders should come to terms with the implications of this extant dichotomy of standards.","PeriodicalId":355760,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of ‏The 3rd International Academic Conference on Research in Social Sciences","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of ‏The 3rd International Academic Conference on Research in Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33422/3rd.iacrss.2021.06.84","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: An expert in Buddhism, Islam, or Christianity has pored over the original or the earliest available texts of the religion that she strives to understand. Adherent to the religion in question or not, the expert has respectfully and objectively tried to observe its application in the lives of the faithful, in its rituals, and practices. She appreciates and can articulate how that religious tradition has impacted on the cultural milieu. She can address its evolution, its highs and its lows. While clear standards exist for identifying an authority on any of the world’s major religions, today’s media largely relies on disparate criteria in their coverage of new religions. Journalists remain largely reliant on personalities who lack appropriate academic training. The “expertise” of some of media’s main sources stems from a questionable narrative that stereotypes and marginalizes millions, denying their religiosity and assessing them based on criteria that could equally be applied to mainstream religions and, yet, for the time being, are not. Few of the individuals making inchoate, often alarmist assertions about new religious movements have any advanced academic training in religion whatsoever. Some alleged authorities cited by the press have no university-level training at all. While today’s media professionals are commendably cautious in reporting on incidents involving race, religion, or ethnicity, they lack such deference in their coverage of new religions. Today’s media leaders should come to terms with the implications of this extant dichotomy of standards.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“仅凭信仰”:新宗教、邪教专家和媒体
一位研究佛教、伊斯兰教或基督教的专家仔细研读了她努力想要理解的这些宗教的原始或最早的可用文本。无论是否坚持所讨论的宗教,专家都尊重和客观地试图观察其在信徒生活,仪式和实践中的应用。她欣赏并能清晰地表达宗教传统对文化环境的影响。她可以讲述它的演变,它的高潮和低谷。虽然在世界上任何一个主要宗教中都有明确的标准来确定权威,但今天的媒体在报道新兴宗教时,在很大程度上依赖于不同的标准。记者仍然很大程度上依赖于缺乏适当学术训练的人。一些媒体主要来源的“专业知识”源于一种有问题的叙述,这种叙述使数百万人定型和边缘化,否认他们的宗教信仰,并根据可以同样适用于主流宗教的标准来评估他们,但目前还没有。在那些对新兴宗教运动做出不成熟的、常常是危言耸听的断言的人当中,很少有人受过任何高级的宗教学术训练。一些被媒体引用的所谓权威人士根本没有大学水平的培训。虽然今天的媒体专业人士在报道涉及种族、宗教或民族的事件时非常谨慎,但他们在报道新兴宗教时却缺乏这种尊重。今天的媒体领导者应该接受这种现存的标准二分法的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Jus Post Bellum: Justice at the End of War The Passive Female Antihero: In Search of Truce A Comparative Study of Space and Time Transference of Main Characters in British and Armenian Fairy Tales The Kosovo War and the End of the Yugoslav Tragedy Analysis of Emotional Intelligence and Health Perception of Abroad Students on an Island During the Quarantine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1