Four Weeks of Omega-3 Supplementation does not Improve Cycling Time Trial Performance in Trained Cyclists

S. JamesLynsey, J. WadleyAlex, Gyimah Boakye, J. HunterDavid, G. RosserTomos, C. ReynoldsJames, S. MastanaSarabjit, R. LindleyMartin
{"title":"Four Weeks of Omega-3 Supplementation does not Improve Cycling Time Trial Performance in Trained Cyclists","authors":"S. JamesLynsey, J. WadleyAlex, Gyimah Boakye, J. HunterDavid, G. RosserTomos, C. ReynoldsJames, S. MastanaSarabjit, R. LindleyMartin","doi":"10.36959/987/258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: This study examined whether omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (n-3 PUFA) supplementation lowered the heart rate (HR), rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and oxygen uptake (V̇ O 2 ) and accordingly improved cycling performance in a time trial. Design: In a randomised, crossover, double-blind study, trained male cyclists (n = 10) were supplemented for 4 weeks with n-3 PUFA (5.7 g/day of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic (DHA)) and 4 weeks with placebo (6g olive oil), with a 4-week washout period. Methods: Cycling performance trials (45 min preload at 70% maximal work rate (Wmax) followed by 15 min time trial) were carried out prior to and following both supplementation periods. Fatty acid composition of blood total lipids was analysed prior to and in response to supplementation. Results: Whole blood n-3 PUFA (% total fatty acids) increased from 1.67% (SD = 0.99%) to 3.72% (SD = 1.22%) (p < 0.05) following 4 weeks n-3 PUFA supplementation. Submaximal measures of V̇ O 2 , HR, respiratory exchange ratio (RER) and RPE were unaffected by supplementation. Time trial performance (mean power W) was unchanged by n-3 PUFA (pre 239 W, SD = 34 W vs post 243 W, SD = 33 W), as were measures of V̇ O 2 , HR, RER and RPE during the time trial. Conclusions: High dose n-3 PUFA supplementation for 4 weeks did not improve cycling performance or attenuate the physiological variables usually associated with improved cycling performance, i.e. V̇ O 2 and HR, in a repeated-measures, placebo-controlled, crossover design study. It is possible that the exercise protocol used in the study was of insufficient intensity for the n-3 PUFA to show beneficial affects due to the highly trained nature of the cyclists.","PeriodicalId":167640,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Sports Medicine","volume":"19 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36959/987/258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study examined whether omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (n-3 PUFA) supplementation lowered the heart rate (HR), rating of perceived exertion (RPE) and oxygen uptake (V̇ O 2 ) and accordingly improved cycling performance in a time trial. Design: In a randomised, crossover, double-blind study, trained male cyclists (n = 10) were supplemented for 4 weeks with n-3 PUFA (5.7 g/day of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic (DHA)) and 4 weeks with placebo (6g olive oil), with a 4-week washout period. Methods: Cycling performance trials (45 min preload at 70% maximal work rate (Wmax) followed by 15 min time trial) were carried out prior to and following both supplementation periods. Fatty acid composition of blood total lipids was analysed prior to and in response to supplementation. Results: Whole blood n-3 PUFA (% total fatty acids) increased from 1.67% (SD = 0.99%) to 3.72% (SD = 1.22%) (p < 0.05) following 4 weeks n-3 PUFA supplementation. Submaximal measures of V̇ O 2 , HR, respiratory exchange ratio (RER) and RPE were unaffected by supplementation. Time trial performance (mean power W) was unchanged by n-3 PUFA (pre 239 W, SD = 34 W vs post 243 W, SD = 33 W), as were measures of V̇ O 2 , HR, RER and RPE during the time trial. Conclusions: High dose n-3 PUFA supplementation for 4 weeks did not improve cycling performance or attenuate the physiological variables usually associated with improved cycling performance, i.e. V̇ O 2 and HR, in a repeated-measures, placebo-controlled, crossover design study. It is possible that the exercise protocol used in the study was of insufficient intensity for the n-3 PUFA to show beneficial affects due to the highly trained nature of the cyclists.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
4周补充Omega-3并不能提高训练自行车运动员的计时赛成绩
目的:本研究考察了在计时赛中补充omega-3多不饱和脂肪酸(n-3 PUFA)是否能降低心率(HR)、感觉运动强度(RPE)和摄氧量(vo2),从而提高循环性能。设计:在一项随机、交叉、双盲研究中,训练有素的男性自行车手(n = 10)被补充了4周的n-3 PUFA (5.7 g/天的二十碳五烯酸(EPA)和二十二碳六烯酸(DHA))和4周的安慰剂(6g橄榄油),并有4周的洗脱期。方法:在补充前后分别进行循环性能试验(以70%最大工作速率(Wmax)预负荷45 min,然后进行15 min计时试验)。在补充前和补充后分析血脂脂肪酸组成。结果:添加4周n-3 PUFA后,全血n-3 PUFA(占总脂肪酸的百分比)由1.67% (SD = 0.99%)提高到3.72% (SD = 1.22%) (p < 0.05)。亚最大值的V O 2、HR、呼吸交换比(RER)和RPE不受补充物的影响。n-3 PUFA对计时性能(平均功率W)没有影响(前239 W, SD = 34 W vs后243 W, SD = 33 W),以及计时期间的V O 2、HR、RER和RPE的测量值。结论:在一项重复测量、安慰剂对照、交叉设计研究中,高剂量n-3 PUFA补充4周并没有改善循环性能,也没有减弱通常与改善循环性能相关的生理变量,即v2和HR。研究中使用的运动方案可能由于骑自行车者训练有素的性质,对n-3 PUFA的强度不够,无法显示出有益的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Relation Between Repetitive Head Traumas and Academic Performance of Non-Concussed High School Athletes: A Comparison of High And Low Contact Sports Injuries Among Adolescent Water Polo Players: Demographics, Evaluation, and Management Acute Influence of Leg Press Exercise on Hamstring Muscles Functional Stress Four Weeks of Omega-3 Supplementation does not Improve Cycling Time Trial Performance in Trained Cyclists Sex Differences in Multidirectional Neck Muscle Strength Characteristics in High School Soccer Athletes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1