Shielding Effectiveness of Long Cables

Albert R. Martin, Steven E. Emert
{"title":"Shielding Effectiveness of Long Cables","authors":"Albert R. Martin, Steven E. Emert","doi":"10.1109/ISEMC.1979.7568782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we discuss a revised triaxial method for testing the shielding effectiveness of long cables. Using this method, measurements show that the commonly accepted rule that doubling cable length decreases the shielding effectiveness by half (6db) holds only for a very special case. In general this rule is not even approximately true, and data are given to illustrate the point. Finally, reasons for the failure of the doubling law are briefly discussed.","PeriodicalId":283257,"journal":{"name":"1979 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1979 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEMC.1979.7568782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss a revised triaxial method for testing the shielding effectiveness of long cables. Using this method, measurements show that the commonly accepted rule that doubling cable length decreases the shielding effectiveness by half (6db) holds only for a very special case. In general this rule is not even approximately true, and data are given to illustrate the point. Finally, reasons for the failure of the doubling law are briefly discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
长电缆的屏蔽效果
本文讨论了一种改进的测试长电缆屏蔽效能的三轴法。使用这种方法,测量表明,普遍接受的规则,即加倍电缆长度减少一半(6db)的屏蔽效果只适用于一个非常特殊的情况。一般来说,这条规则甚至不是近似正确的,并给出数据来说明这一点。最后简要讨论了双重定律失效的原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Numerical Electromagnetic Code (NEC) Can Interference Be Regulated? Everyday Analyses Using IEMCAP Models and Programmable Calculators A Broadband, Isotropic, Real-Time, Electric-Field Sensor (BIRES) Using Resistively Loaded Dipoles for EMI Measurements New Techniques for the Measurement of Natural and Simulated Lightning Phenomena
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1