Memahami Konstruksi Nalar Epistemologi Etnik: Sebuah Kajian Filosofis

Elvy Maria Manurung, Y. S. Purwadi, I. B. Sugiharto
{"title":"Memahami Konstruksi Nalar Epistemologi Etnik: Sebuah Kajian Filosofis","authors":"Elvy Maria Manurung, Y. S. Purwadi, I. B. Sugiharto","doi":"10.31385/jl.v21i1.258.71-86","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the 21st century, due to its incessant auto-criticism, the orientation of science is split into two. On the one hand, the monolythic tendency of positivism -with its physicalistic paradigm- is still prevalent. On the other, the tendency of openess toward the complexity of reality is also thriving. The latter would include the openess toward non physical variables or even toward esoteric experience. At this junction, the concept ofethnoepistemology is worth considering. With regard to this, this article seeks to see the fundamental differences between the universal-scientific epistemology and ethnoepistemology. Ethnoepistemology is examined in terms of its local ontological-worldview, which mostly is spiritual in character.  It was found out that the local worldview generates a particular knowledge, with specific logic, method and vocabulary of its own. Complemented with some case-studies, the article comes up with the idea that the mistery of the world can be accessed from many points of view, resulting in different kinds of knowledge. That said, while scientific epistemology is not the only possible one, ethnopistemology can upgrade itself by learning from the work-ethos of scientific epistemology.  Key words: episteme, worldview, logic, interdependency, holistic, experiential","PeriodicalId":338978,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ledalero","volume":"5 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ledalero","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31385/jl.v21i1.258.71-86","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the 21st century, due to its incessant auto-criticism, the orientation of science is split into two. On the one hand, the monolythic tendency of positivism -with its physicalistic paradigm- is still prevalent. On the other, the tendency of openess toward the complexity of reality is also thriving. The latter would include the openess toward non physical variables or even toward esoteric experience. At this junction, the concept ofethnoepistemology is worth considering. With regard to this, this article seeks to see the fundamental differences between the universal-scientific epistemology and ethnoepistemology. Ethnoepistemology is examined in terms of its local ontological-worldview, which mostly is spiritual in character.  It was found out that the local worldview generates a particular knowledge, with specific logic, method and vocabulary of its own. Complemented with some case-studies, the article comes up with the idea that the mistery of the world can be accessed from many points of view, resulting in different kinds of knowledge. That said, while scientific epistemology is not the only possible one, ethnopistemology can upgrade itself by learning from the work-ethos of scientific epistemology.  Key words: episteme, worldview, logic, interdependency, holistic, experiential
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
理解民族认识论的认知结构:哲学研究
在21世纪,由于不断的自我批判,科学的取向分裂为两种。一方面,实证主义的一元化倾向及其物理主义范式仍然盛行。另一方面,对现实的复杂性持开放态度的趋势也在蓬勃发展。后者将包括对非物理变量的开放,甚至是对深奥经验的开放。在这个交叉点上,民族认识论的概念值得思考。在这方面,本文试图看到普遍科学认识论与民族认识论之间的根本区别。民族认识论是根据其地方性的本体论世界观来考察的,这种本体论世界观主要是精神性的。我们发现,当地的世界观产生了一种特定的知识,有自己特定的逻辑、方法和词汇。文章通过一些案例研究,提出了世界的奥秘可以从许多角度来理解,从而产生不同种类的知识。也就是说,虽然科学认识论不是唯一可能的认识论,但民族认识论可以通过学习科学认识论的工作精神来提升自己。关键词:认知、世界观、逻辑、相互依存、整体、经验
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Tirani Meritokrasi dan Reimajinasi Solidaritas: Sebuah Kajian Berdasarkan Perspektif Michael Sandel Ekonomi Politik, Internet, dan Demokrasi Peranan Modal Sosial dalam Pencegahan dan Penanganan Masalah Intoleransi di Nusa Tenggara Timur Globalisasi sebagai Fenomen Kebudayaan Studi Kritis atas Kepercayaan Orang Manggarai – Flores tentang Komunikasi antara Arwah dengan Orang-orang Hidup
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1