Atlas modernizatsii Rossii i ee regionov: Sotsioekonomicheskie i sotsiokul'turnye tendentsii i problemy ed. by N. I. Lapin (review)

R. Tangalycheva
{"title":"Atlas modernizatsii Rossii i ee regionov: Sotsioekonomicheskie i sotsiokul'turnye tendentsii i problemy ed. by N. I. Lapin (review)","authors":"R. Tangalycheva","doi":"10.1353/REG.2018.0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The work reviewed here represents an attempt to gain an understanding of new tendencies in the modernization of contemporary Russia and its regions. The authors’ main focus is on the processes of the primary industrial stage of development in Russia and the transition to the secondary information stage. The authors aim to show the hierarchical differentiation of Russian federal subjects and federal districts in terms of modernization and to elicit contradictory tendencies in the regions’ evolution. The significance of this research lies in its implications for the modernization program outlined by Dmitrii Medvedev in 2009. According to the authors’ analysis, this program never resulted in the scientific development of a modernization strategy in Russia, let alone its practical implementation and regulation. The introductory section demonstrates the theoretical and methodological basis of their research, namely the concept of modernization as a civilizational process, and outlines the sociocultural challenges that Russian modernization has to tackle. In the following seven chapters, the authors consider processes, tendencies, and issues of modernization implemented between 2000 and 2012 in seven Russian federal districts. The authors connect Russian modernization processes with global development patterns. According to their data, approximately 90 developing countries are in the industrial stage of modernization and approximately 40 developed countries are in the informational stage, which points to the existence of multiple modernization processes. In a number of countries, including Russia, both stages of modernization are being implemented at the same time, with one type prevailing over the other in different parts of the country, thus indicating uneven modernization patterns in different regions. The novelty of the book is to be found in the authors’ analysis of these uneven modernization processes in different parts of Russia. As this area of research is undeveloped, the Russian academy, the authors of this volume, follow the approach developed by the Center for Modernization Studies of the Academy of Sciences of China.1 Doing so enables the use of annual modernization indices in 130 countries with populations over one million (including the Russian Federation). Analyzing these indices reveals a great imbalance between Russian regions in the primary industrial and secondary information","PeriodicalId":307724,"journal":{"name":"Region: Regional Studies of Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Region: Regional Studies of Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/REG.2018.0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The work reviewed here represents an attempt to gain an understanding of new tendencies in the modernization of contemporary Russia and its regions. The authors’ main focus is on the processes of the primary industrial stage of development in Russia and the transition to the secondary information stage. The authors aim to show the hierarchical differentiation of Russian federal subjects and federal districts in terms of modernization and to elicit contradictory tendencies in the regions’ evolution. The significance of this research lies in its implications for the modernization program outlined by Dmitrii Medvedev in 2009. According to the authors’ analysis, this program never resulted in the scientific development of a modernization strategy in Russia, let alone its practical implementation and regulation. The introductory section demonstrates the theoretical and methodological basis of their research, namely the concept of modernization as a civilizational process, and outlines the sociocultural challenges that Russian modernization has to tackle. In the following seven chapters, the authors consider processes, tendencies, and issues of modernization implemented between 2000 and 2012 in seven Russian federal districts. The authors connect Russian modernization processes with global development patterns. According to their data, approximately 90 developing countries are in the industrial stage of modernization and approximately 40 developed countries are in the informational stage, which points to the existence of multiple modernization processes. In a number of countries, including Russia, both stages of modernization are being implemented at the same time, with one type prevailing over the other in different parts of the country, thus indicating uneven modernization patterns in different regions. The novelty of the book is to be found in the authors’ analysis of these uneven modernization processes in different parts of Russia. As this area of research is undeveloped, the Russian academy, the authors of this volume, follow the approach developed by the Center for Modernization Studies of the Academy of Sciences of China.1 Doing so enables the use of annual modernization indices in 130 countries with populations over one million (including the Russian Federation). Analyzing these indices reveals a great imbalance between Russian regions in the primary industrial and secondary information
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
这里回顾的工作代表了对当代俄罗斯及其地区现代化新趋势的理解的一种尝试。作者主要关注的是俄罗斯发展的初级工业阶段和向次级信息阶段过渡的过程。作者的目的是展示俄罗斯联邦主体和联邦区在现代化方面的等级分化,并引出地区演变中的矛盾趋势。这项研究的意义在于它对梅德韦杰夫在2009年提出的现代化计划的启示。根据作者的分析,该计划从未导致俄罗斯现代化战略的科学发展,更不用说其实际实施和监管了。引言部分展示了他们研究的理论和方法基础,即现代化作为一个文明进程的概念,并概述了俄罗斯现代化必须解决的社会文化挑战。在接下来的七章中,作者考虑了2000年至2012年在俄罗斯七个联邦区实施的现代化进程、趋势和问题。作者将俄罗斯现代化进程与全球发展模式联系起来。根据他们的数据,大约有90个发展中国家处于现代化的工业阶段,大约有40个发达国家处于现代化的信息化阶段,这表明存在多重现代化进程。在包括俄罗斯在内的一些国家,现代化的两个阶段正在同时进行,在该国的不同地区,一种形式比另一种形式占优势,从而表明不同地区的现代化形式不均衡。这本书的新颖之处在于作者对俄罗斯不同地区不平衡的现代化进程的分析。由于这一研究领域尚不发达,本卷的作者俄罗斯科学院采用了中国科学院现代化研究中心开发的方法1,这样做可以使用130个人口超过100万的国家(包括俄罗斯联邦)的年度现代化指数。通过对这些指标的分析,可以发现俄罗斯各地区在第一产业和第二信息方面存在着严重的不平衡
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Uzbek Migrants in Türkiye: Gender, Satisfaction in Türkiye, and Return Intentions On Arid Ground: Political Ecologies of Empire in Russian Central Asia by Jennifer Keating (review) Analyzing the Compatibility of the Remedial Right of Secession with Regard to the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict Arrested Development: The Soviet Union in Ghana, Guinea, and Mali, 1955–1968 by Alessandro Iandolo (review) "Save the Children!": The Symbol of Childhood and (De)Legitimation of Power in Russian Protests, 2017–21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1