Taking trajectory based operations to the next level: Management by trajectory

Alicia Borgman Fernandes, S. Atkins, K. Leiden, Timothy Bagnali, Curt Kaler, M. Evans, A. Bell, T. Kilbourne, M. Jackson
{"title":"Taking trajectory based operations to the next level: Management by trajectory","authors":"Alicia Borgman Fernandes, S. Atkins, K. Leiden, Timothy Bagnali, Curt Kaler, M. Evans, A. Bell, T. Kilbourne, M. Jackson","doi":"10.1109/ICNSURV.2018.8384865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Management by Trajectory (MBT) is a NASA concept for taking Trajectory Based Operations (TBO) to the next level of maturity. MBT looks beyond enabling technologies to flesh out the operational concept and look at how TBO changes the ways in which actors interact. In MBT, each aircraft has an assigned trajectory that is negotiated between the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and airspace user (AU) and complies with all National Airspace System (NAS) constraints. Any deviation from the assigned trajectory must be negotiated. In addition to the request/response interactions between controllers and pilots that have so far been proposed to support Data Comm, trajectory negotiation under MBT leverages emerging capabilities to support much richer negotiations. MBT proposes a higher level language to support new kinds of requests and responses, such as providing new or amended constraints to which a trajectory must conform and allowing the trajectory to be proposed by the AU, or controllers offering solution options to the AU for the AU to select the preferred solution. The key MBT benefit mechanisms are trajectory predictability and AU flexibility. Improved predictability supports more efficient operations, from earlier and less frequent conflict detection and resolution to better calibration of traffic flow management decision-making to balance demand with capacity. Improved flexibility allows AUs to act on their trajectory preferences. This paper provides an overview of the MBT concept and discusses open questions to be explored in future concept evaluation activities.","PeriodicalId":112779,"journal":{"name":"2018 Integrated Communications, Navigation, Surveillance Conference (ICNS)","volume":"107 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 Integrated Communications, Navigation, Surveillance Conference (ICNS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNSURV.2018.8384865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Management by Trajectory (MBT) is a NASA concept for taking Trajectory Based Operations (TBO) to the next level of maturity. MBT looks beyond enabling technologies to flesh out the operational concept and look at how TBO changes the ways in which actors interact. In MBT, each aircraft has an assigned trajectory that is negotiated between the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and airspace user (AU) and complies with all National Airspace System (NAS) constraints. Any deviation from the assigned trajectory must be negotiated. In addition to the request/response interactions between controllers and pilots that have so far been proposed to support Data Comm, trajectory negotiation under MBT leverages emerging capabilities to support much richer negotiations. MBT proposes a higher level language to support new kinds of requests and responses, such as providing new or amended constraints to which a trajectory must conform and allowing the trajectory to be proposed by the AU, or controllers offering solution options to the AU for the AU to select the preferred solution. The key MBT benefit mechanisms are trajectory predictability and AU flexibility. Improved predictability supports more efficient operations, from earlier and less frequent conflict detection and resolution to better calibration of traffic flow management decision-making to balance demand with capacity. Improved flexibility allows AUs to act on their trajectory preferences. This paper provides an overview of the MBT concept and discusses open questions to be explored in future concept evaluation activities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将基于轨迹的操作提升到下一个层次:按轨迹管理
轨迹管理(MBT)是NASA将基于轨迹的操作(TBO)推向下一个成熟阶段的概念。MBT不仅仅着眼于使技术具体化操作概念,还着眼于TBO如何改变参与者交互的方式。在MBT中,每架飞机都有一个由联邦航空管理局(FAA)和空域用户(AU)协商确定的指定轨迹,并遵守所有国家空域系统(NAS)的约束。任何偏离指定轨迹的情况都必须协商。除了目前提出的支持数据通信的控制器和飞行员之间的请求/响应交互之外,MBT下的轨迹协商利用了新兴功能来支持更丰富的协商。MBT提出了一种更高层次的语言来支持新的请求和响应类型,例如提供新的或修改的约束,轨迹必须符合这些约束,并允许轨迹由AU提出,或者控制器向AU提供解决方案选项,以便AU选择首选的解决方案。关键的主战坦克效益机制是轨迹可预测性和非盟灵活性。从更早、更少地发现和解决冲突,到更好地校准交通流量管理决策,以平衡需求和容量,可预测性的提高支持更有效的运营。改进的灵活性允许AUs根据它们的轨迹偏好进行操作。本文概述了MBT概念,并讨论了未来概念评估活动中有待探索的开放性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the security of aeronautical datalink communications: Problems and solutions Total system error performance of drones for an unmanned PBN concept Rapid assessment of air traffic impact of blocking airspaces: Integrated communications navigation and surveillance (ICNS) conference Narrowband propagation statistics of aeronautical mobile-ground links in the L- and C-bands Bird strike risk mitigation using avian radar and ADS-B
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1