Impossibility of Differentially Private Universally Optimal Mechanisms

H. Brenner, Kobbi Nissim
{"title":"Impossibility of Differentially Private Universally Optimal Mechanisms","authors":"H. Brenner, Kobbi Nissim","doi":"10.1137/110846671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The notion of {\\em a universally utility-maximizing privacy mechanism} was recently introduced by Ghosh, Rough garden, and Sundararajan~[STOC 2009]. These are mechanisms that guarantee optimal utility to a large class of information consumers, {\\em simultaneously}, while preserving {\\em Differential Privacy} [Dwork, McSherry, Nissim, and Smith, TCC 2006]. Ghosh, Rough garden and Sundararajan have demonstrated, quite surprisingly, a case where such a universally-optimal differentially-private mechanisms exists, when the information consumers are Bayesian. This result was recently extended by Gupte and Sundararajan~[PODS 2010] to risk-averse consumers. Both positive results deal with mechanisms (approximately) computing a {\\em single count query} (i.e., the number of individuals satisfying a specific property in a given population), and the starting point of our work is a trial at extending these results to similar settings, such as sum queries with non-binary individual values, histograms, and two (or more) count queries. We show, however, that universally-optimal mechanisms do not exist for all these queries, both for Bayesian and risk-averse consumers. For the Bayesian case, we go further, and give a characterization of those functions that admit universally-optimal mechanisms, showing that a universally-optimal mechanism exists, essentially, only for a (single) count query. At the heart of our proof is a representation of a query function $f$ by its {\\em privacy constraint graph} $G_f$ whose edges correspond to values resulting by applying $f$ to neighboring databases.","PeriodicalId":228365,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE 51st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"87","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE 51st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1137/110846671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 87

Abstract

The notion of {\em a universally utility-maximizing privacy mechanism} was recently introduced by Ghosh, Rough garden, and Sundararajan~[STOC 2009]. These are mechanisms that guarantee optimal utility to a large class of information consumers, {\em simultaneously}, while preserving {\em Differential Privacy} [Dwork, McSherry, Nissim, and Smith, TCC 2006]. Ghosh, Rough garden and Sundararajan have demonstrated, quite surprisingly, a case where such a universally-optimal differentially-private mechanisms exists, when the information consumers are Bayesian. This result was recently extended by Gupte and Sundararajan~[PODS 2010] to risk-averse consumers. Both positive results deal with mechanisms (approximately) computing a {\em single count query} (i.e., the number of individuals satisfying a specific property in a given population), and the starting point of our work is a trial at extending these results to similar settings, such as sum queries with non-binary individual values, histograms, and two (or more) count queries. We show, however, that universally-optimal mechanisms do not exist for all these queries, both for Bayesian and risk-averse consumers. For the Bayesian case, we go further, and give a characterization of those functions that admit universally-optimal mechanisms, showing that a universally-optimal mechanism exists, essentially, only for a (single) count query. At the heart of our proof is a representation of a query function $f$ by its {\em privacy constraint graph} $G_f$ whose edges correspond to values resulting by applying $f$ to neighboring databases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
差异私有普遍最优机制的不可能性
{\em是一种普遍的效用最大化隐私机制}的概念最近由Ghosh、Rough garden和Sundararajan提出[STOC 2009]。这些机制保证了对大量信息消费者的最佳效用,同时保护了差异隐私[Dwork, McSherry, Nissim, and Smith, TCC 2006]。Ghosh、Rough garden和Sundararajan非常令人惊讶地证明,当信息消费者是贝叶斯的时候,存在这样一个普遍最优的差异隐私机制。这一结果最近被Gupte和Sundararajan [PODS 2010]推广到规避风险的消费者。两个积极的结果都处理(近似地)计算{\em单计数查询}的机制(即,在给定总体中满足特定属性的个体数量),我们工作的起点是尝试将这些结果扩展到类似的设置,例如具有非二进制个体值、直方图和两个(或更多)计数查询的总和查询。然而,我们表明,对于所有这些查询,无论是对于贝叶斯消费者还是风险规避消费者,普遍最优机制都不存在。对于贝叶斯情况,我们更进一步,给出了那些承认普遍最优机制的函数的特征,表明存在普遍最优机制,本质上,只存在于(单个)计数查询。我们证明的核心是一个查询函数$f$的表示,它的{\em隐私约束图}$G_f$,其边对应于将$f$应用于相邻数据库所产生的值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
On the Computational Complexity of Coin Flipping The Monotone Complexity of k-clique on Random Graphs Local List Decoding with a Constant Number of Queries Agnostically Learning under Permutation Invariant Distributions Pseudorandom Generators for Regular Branching Programs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1