Functional Outcomes in Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery of the Skull Base, A rising challenge

David Bedoya, J. Enseñat, Isam Alobidt, C. Langdon
{"title":"Functional Outcomes in Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery of the Skull Base, A rising challenge","authors":"David Bedoya, J. Enseñat, Isam Alobidt, C. Langdon","doi":"10.33552/ojor.2019.01.000520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extended endonasal endoscopic approaches (EEEA) for skull base lesions have been increasing over the last decade. Determinants for this development are the enhanced understanding of the endoscopic anatomy, improvement of imaging systems and specific instruments, and the use of vascularized flaps for reconstruction [1]. This EEEA can cause postoperative morbidity related to the reconstruction, like crusting and posterior rhinorrhea, especially in those cases requiring an endonasal flap [2,3]. The healing process start the first week with a reepithelization by stratified epithelium, then hair cells appear in the third week and complete recovery of the sinus epithelium occurs within 6-8 weeks [4]. Given this, [5] conclude that one must wait at least three months to assess the clinical and postoperative symptoms. Regarding quality of life (QOL) after EEEA evidence have shown that the morbidity is related to the extension of the approach. [6] reported a negative impact in QOL after the use of nasoseptal flap which is commonly associated to extended approaches. The latter was mainly due to an increased tendency to headaches and reduced smell; however, recovery occurs over time especially in those patients with secreting pituitary tumors. Since the use of endoscopic skull base surgery, there have been great efforts to develop specific QOL questionnaires for EEEA and pituitary surgery (Table 1) Until now, the following tests have been applied in English literature; Quality of Life-Assessment of Growth Hormone Deficiency in Adults [7], Hypopituitarism Quality of Life Satisfaction (QLS-H) [8], Previous Skull Base Quality of Life (ASB-QOL) [9], Hormone Deficiency-Dependent Quality of Life ( HDQOL) [10], Acromegaly Quality of Life (ACROQOL) [11], Pituitary Adenoma Quality of Life (PA-QOL) [12], Cushing Quality of Life [13], Addison Quality of Life (AddiQOL) [14], or ASK nasal inventory [15]. Handicaps for these tests are that they do not include specific areas about quality of life and cancer, visual defects, hormonal deficiency or sinonasal symptoms. Here, we will discuss the impact of EEEA regarding the following topics:","PeriodicalId":365490,"journal":{"name":"Online Journal of Otolaryngology and Rhinology","volume":"213 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online Journal of Otolaryngology and Rhinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33552/ojor.2019.01.000520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extended endonasal endoscopic approaches (EEEA) for skull base lesions have been increasing over the last decade. Determinants for this development are the enhanced understanding of the endoscopic anatomy, improvement of imaging systems and specific instruments, and the use of vascularized flaps for reconstruction [1]. This EEEA can cause postoperative morbidity related to the reconstruction, like crusting and posterior rhinorrhea, especially in those cases requiring an endonasal flap [2,3]. The healing process start the first week with a reepithelization by stratified epithelium, then hair cells appear in the third week and complete recovery of the sinus epithelium occurs within 6-8 weeks [4]. Given this, [5] conclude that one must wait at least three months to assess the clinical and postoperative symptoms. Regarding quality of life (QOL) after EEEA evidence have shown that the morbidity is related to the extension of the approach. [6] reported a negative impact in QOL after the use of nasoseptal flap which is commonly associated to extended approaches. The latter was mainly due to an increased tendency to headaches and reduced smell; however, recovery occurs over time especially in those patients with secreting pituitary tumors. Since the use of endoscopic skull base surgery, there have been great efforts to develop specific QOL questionnaires for EEEA and pituitary surgery (Table 1) Until now, the following tests have been applied in English literature; Quality of Life-Assessment of Growth Hormone Deficiency in Adults [7], Hypopituitarism Quality of Life Satisfaction (QLS-H) [8], Previous Skull Base Quality of Life (ASB-QOL) [9], Hormone Deficiency-Dependent Quality of Life ( HDQOL) [10], Acromegaly Quality of Life (ACROQOL) [11], Pituitary Adenoma Quality of Life (PA-QOL) [12], Cushing Quality of Life [13], Addison Quality of Life (AddiQOL) [14], or ASK nasal inventory [15]. Handicaps for these tests are that they do not include specific areas about quality of life and cancer, visual defects, hormonal deficiency or sinonasal symptoms. Here, we will discuss the impact of EEEA regarding the following topics:
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颅底鼻内窥镜手术的功能结局,一个不断上升的挑战
扩展鼻内窥镜入路(EEEA)颅底病变已增加在过去的十年。这一发展的决定因素是对内窥镜解剖的进一步了解,成像系统和特定仪器的改进,以及血管化皮瓣重建bbb的使用。这种EEEA可引起与重建相关的术后并发症,如结痂和后鼻溢,特别是在需要鼻内皮瓣的病例中[2,3]。愈合过程始于第一周,由分层上皮重新形成,然后在第三周出现毛细胞,窦上皮在6-8周内完全恢复。鉴于此,[5]得出结论,必须等待至少三个月才能评估临床和术后症状。关于EEEA后的生活质量(QOL),有证据表明其发病率与手术方法的延长有关。[6]报道使用鼻中隔瓣后对生活质量的负面影响,这通常与扩展入路有关。后者主要是由于头痛倾向增加和嗅觉减弱;然而,恢复需要一段时间,特别是那些患有垂体瘤的患者。自采用内窥镜颅底手术以来,针对EEEA和垂体手术开展了针对性的QOL问卷研究(表1)。迄今为止,英文文献中应用了以下测试:成人生长激素缺乏生活质量评价[7]、垂体功能减退生活质量满意度(QLS-H)[8]、既往颅底生活质量(ASB-QOL)[9]、激素缺乏依赖生活质量(HDQOL)[10]、肢端肥大症生活质量(ACROQOL)[11]、垂体腺瘤生活质量(paqol)[12]、库辛生活质量[13]、艾迪生生活质量(AddiQOL)[14]、ASK鼻部检查[10]0。这些测试的缺陷在于它们不包括生活质量和癌症、视力缺陷、激素缺乏或鼻窦症状等具体领域。在这里,我们将讨论EEEA对以下主题的影响:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Recalcitrant Neck Abscesses as a Late Complication of Neck Liposuction: Case Report Creating A Protocol for the Management of Epistaxis in A Tertiary Care Centre-A Practical Application of the British Rhinological Society Multidisciplinary Consensus Recommendations on the Hospital Management of Epistaxis Ectopic Thyroid Mimicking A Thyroglossal Duct Cyst: A Case Report A Clinical Epidemiological Study of Patients with Coronavirus Disease Associated Mucormycosis Treated at A Tertiary Care Nodal Centre Defining High-Risk Tracheostomy in the Intensive Care Unit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1