Strength of lithium disilicate ceramics bonded with two different adhesives

Karlla Elizabeth Pezo-Vargas, Joyce Mariana Salinas-Francia, J. Domínguez
{"title":"Strength of lithium disilicate ceramics bonded with two different adhesives","authors":"Karlla Elizabeth Pezo-Vargas, Joyce Mariana Salinas-Francia, J. Domínguez","doi":"10.17533/udea.rfo.v34n2a2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: lithium disilicate ceramics are an excellent choice in rehabilitation, made with the technique of injection or machining. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of two adhesive systems on the values of binding resistance in injected and machined lithium disilicate ceramics. Methods: lithium disilicate disks, IPS e. were used Max CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein, Swiss), 10mm in diameter and 1mm in thickness embedded in PVC tubes. Was distributed in 4 working groups, 2 in injected lithium ceramics and 2 in machined, Palfique Bond and Tetric N-bond Universal adhesives were applied according to the group distribution, then photopolymerized for 10 seconds with led light bulb, Tygon® tubes were placed for filling with fluid resin; once the Tygon® tubes were removed. The samples were taken to a universal testing machine where the micro-spraying test was performed. Results: the most significant binding resistance values were found in lithium disisilicate ceramics adhered with the Palfique Bond and Tetric Bond adhesive having a significant difference (p= 0,001), the bond strength values of the Palfique Bond and Tetric Bond adhesive in injected ceramic did not differ significantly. Conclusion: machined lithium disilicate ceramics have better values of binding resistance to micro-spraying.","PeriodicalId":272900,"journal":{"name":"Revista Facultad de Odontología","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Facultad de Odontología","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17533/udea.rfo.v34n2a2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: lithium disilicate ceramics are an excellent choice in rehabilitation, made with the technique of injection or machining. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of two adhesive systems on the values of binding resistance in injected and machined lithium disilicate ceramics. Methods: lithium disilicate disks, IPS e. were used Max CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein, Swiss), 10mm in diameter and 1mm in thickness embedded in PVC tubes. Was distributed in 4 working groups, 2 in injected lithium ceramics and 2 in machined, Palfique Bond and Tetric N-bond Universal adhesives were applied according to the group distribution, then photopolymerized for 10 seconds with led light bulb, Tygon® tubes were placed for filling with fluid resin; once the Tygon® tubes were removed. The samples were taken to a universal testing machine where the micro-spraying test was performed. Results: the most significant binding resistance values were found in lithium disisilicate ceramics adhered with the Palfique Bond and Tetric Bond adhesive having a significant difference (p= 0,001), the bond strength values of the Palfique Bond and Tetric Bond adhesive in injected ceramic did not differ significantly. Conclusion: machined lithium disilicate ceramics have better values of binding resistance to micro-spraying.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用两种不同的粘合剂粘合二硅酸锂陶瓷的强度
简介:二硅酸锂陶瓷是康复治疗的绝佳选择,可采用注射或机械加工技术制成。本研究的目的是评估两种粘合剂系统对注射和加工二硅酸锂陶瓷结合电阻值的影响。方法:采用直径10mm,厚度1mm的Max CAD (Ivoclar Vivadent,列支敦士登,瑞士)二硅酸锂片(IPS),嵌入PVC管中。分为4个工作组,2个为注射锂陶瓷组,2个为机械加工组,按分组分布涂上Palfique Bond和Tetric N-bond通用胶粘剂,然后与led灯泡光聚合10秒,放置Tygon®管充入流体树脂;一旦Tygon®管被移除。将样品送到万能试验机上进行微喷涂试验。结果:Palfique Bond和Tetric Bond黏合剂黏合在硅酸锂陶瓷中的结合电阻值最显著,差异有统计学意义(p= 0.001),注射陶瓷中Palfique Bond和Tetric Bond黏合的结合强度值差异无统计学意义。结论:加工后的二硅酸锂陶瓷具有较好的抗微喷涂结合性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Friction in orthodontics Dental anxiety before the first step and after the second step of periodontitis therapy Typical esthetic outcomes using 5 different modalities to treat MIH affected teeth: a case series Perceptions about health (physical, mental and oral) in a group of women in situation of prostitution in the city of Medellin Oroantral communications: a literature review and update
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1