Managerial Miscalibration and Its Effects on the Auditability of Accounting Estimates: Evidence from Pension Accounting

U. Menzefricke, Wally J. Smieliauskas
{"title":"Managerial Miscalibration and Its Effects on the Auditability of Accounting Estimates: Evidence from Pension Accounting","authors":"U. Menzefricke, Wally J. Smieliauskas","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2899070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this archival study, we report three main findings related to how well pension accounting estimates of practice meet the stated objectives of professional accounting standards. Our evidence on estimated returns in pension accounting used in reporting on defined benefit pension plans in the financial statements indicates the following. First, the financial note disclosures of ranges of estimated returns are miscalibrated and provide low credibility of including either the actual or expected returns. Second, the estimated returns are unreliable estimates of the firms’ actual 10-year averages. Finally, the estimated returns can have significant risk of material misstatement arising from the uncertainty in the estimation process over the short run. The combination of these findings indicates that the estimated returns and related note disclosures on the ranges of the returns used in estimation processes may not be auditable, and may not meet the stated financial reporting objectives of professional accounting standards.","PeriodicalId":309161,"journal":{"name":"2017 CAAA Annual Conference (Archive)","volume":"118 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 CAAA Annual Conference (Archive)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2899070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this archival study, we report three main findings related to how well pension accounting estimates of practice meet the stated objectives of professional accounting standards. Our evidence on estimated returns in pension accounting used in reporting on defined benefit pension plans in the financial statements indicates the following. First, the financial note disclosures of ranges of estimated returns are miscalibrated and provide low credibility of including either the actual or expected returns. Second, the estimated returns are unreliable estimates of the firms’ actual 10-year averages. Finally, the estimated returns can have significant risk of material misstatement arising from the uncertainty in the estimation process over the short run. The combination of these findings indicates that the estimated returns and related note disclosures on the ranges of the returns used in estimation processes may not be auditable, and may not meet the stated financial reporting objectives of professional accounting standards.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
管理偏差及其对会计估计可审计性的影响:来自养老金会计的证据
在本档案研究中,我们报告了与养老金会计估计实务如何满足专业会计准则规定目标相关的三个主要发现。我们关于在财务报表中报告固定收益养老金计划时使用的养老金会计估计收益的证据表明:首先,财务票据披露的估计收益范围校准不当,包括实际或预期收益的可信度较低。其次,对公司实际10年平均收益的估计是不可靠的。最后,在短期内,由于估计过程中的不确定性,估计收益可能存在重大错报风险。综合这些发现表明,估计过程中使用的估计收益和对收益范围的相关附注披露可能不可审计,并且可能不符合专业会计准则规定的财务报告目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Why Firms Announce Good News Late: Earnings Management and Financial Reporting Timeliness Managerial Miscalibration and Its Effects on the Auditability of Accounting Estimates: Evidence from Pension Accounting A Consistent Research Design for Value Relevance Studies Limits to Nonmarket Insurance: A Textual Analysis of the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Media Sentiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1