4-meter gait speed test as a tool to prescribe walking exercise intensity in individuals with COPD

Gianna Waldrich Bisc, A. Morita, F. Machado, Antenor Rodrigues, Thais SantAnna, N. Hernandes, F. Pitta
{"title":"4-meter gait speed test as a tool to prescribe walking exercise intensity in individuals with COPD","authors":"Gianna Waldrich Bisc, A. Morita, F. Machado, Antenor Rodrigues, Thais SantAnna, N. Hernandes, F. Pitta","doi":"10.4322/2675-9977.cpcr.42316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Exercise training remains the essential component of rehabilitation programs in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)1. In order to guarantee the training benefits, an appropriate prescription of exercise intensity is necessary1. The target intensity for training is generally prescribed as a percentage of maximum exercise capacity1; however, a simple field test such as the 6-minute walking test (6MWT) was shown to be useful in exercise prescription for walking2-4 . The importance of the 6MWT to evaluate exercise capacity is undeniable5; nevertheless, the test requires space and time, which may hinder its use in home visits and in some clinical settings. On the other hand, the 4-meter gait speed (4MGS) is a reliable test, which requires short time and space6-9. It reflects global well-being and captures the multisystemic effects of disease severity9. Furthermore, walking is the main activity in a rehabilitation program and gait speed measure is modifiable through rehabilitation, therefore being a potential marker of functional improvement or decline8-9. Although the 4MGS has potential as an assessment tool, further work is necessary to confirm its utilization for exercise prescription. Therefore, the aims of this study were to verify whether it is possible to prescribe the intensity of walking exercise training and to predict the distance covered in the 6MWT through the 4MGS in individuals with moderate-to-very severe COPD. In addition, since there are different available protocols for the 4MGS, another aim was to identify which protocol better estimates these outcomes.","PeriodicalId":164984,"journal":{"name":"Cardiorespiratory Physiotherapy, Critical Care and Rehabilitation","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiorespiratory Physiotherapy, Critical Care and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4322/2675-9977.cpcr.42316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction Exercise training remains the essential component of rehabilitation programs in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)1. In order to guarantee the training benefits, an appropriate prescription of exercise intensity is necessary1. The target intensity for training is generally prescribed as a percentage of maximum exercise capacity1; however, a simple field test such as the 6-minute walking test (6MWT) was shown to be useful in exercise prescription for walking2-4 . The importance of the 6MWT to evaluate exercise capacity is undeniable5; nevertheless, the test requires space and time, which may hinder its use in home visits and in some clinical settings. On the other hand, the 4-meter gait speed (4MGS) is a reliable test, which requires short time and space6-9. It reflects global well-being and captures the multisystemic effects of disease severity9. Furthermore, walking is the main activity in a rehabilitation program and gait speed measure is modifiable through rehabilitation, therefore being a potential marker of functional improvement or decline8-9. Although the 4MGS has potential as an assessment tool, further work is necessary to confirm its utilization for exercise prescription. Therefore, the aims of this study were to verify whether it is possible to prescribe the intensity of walking exercise training and to predict the distance covered in the 6MWT through the 4MGS in individuals with moderate-to-very severe COPD. In addition, since there are different available protocols for the 4MGS, another aim was to identify which protocol better estimates these outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
4米步态速度测试作为COPD患者步行运动强度处方的工具
运动训练仍然是慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者康复计划的重要组成部分。为了保证训练效果,需要适当的运动强度处方1。训练的目标强度通常以最大运动能力的百分比来规定1;然而,一个简单的实地测试,如6分钟步行测试(6MWT)被证明是有用的运动处方步行2-4。6MWT对于评估运动能力的重要性是不可否认的。然而,该测试需要空间和时间,这可能会妨碍其在家访和一些临床环境中的使用。另一方面,4米步速(4MGS)是一种可靠的测试,需要的时间和空间都很短6-9。它反映了全球福祉,反映了疾病严重程度的多系统影响。此外,步行是康复计划中的主要活动,步态速度测量可以通过康复进行调整,因此是功能改善或下降的潜在标志8-9。虽然4MGS有潜力作为一种评估工具,但需要进一步的工作来确认其在运动处方中的应用。因此,本研究的目的是验证是否有可能规定步行运动训练的强度,并通过4MGS预测中度至极重度COPD患者6MWT所覆盖的距离。此外,由于4MGS有不同的可用协议,因此另一个目标是确定哪个协议能更好地估计这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analysis of heart rate variability and accelerometry in patients following surgery for the treatment of gastrointestinal cancer In-hospital mobilization after cardiac surgery: investigation of a dose-effect of once- and twice-daily exercise on cardiac autonomic modulation Can diaphragmatic mobility be measured by chest wall volumes? Disease-related knowledge, health behaviours and clinical outcomes following an educational intervention in patients with diabetes according to their health literacy level: a systematic review Cardiorespiratory Physiotherapy, Critical Care and Rehabilitation (CPCR) journal: a new source of scientific knowledge for physiotherapy clinicians and researchers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1