Student’s Mathematical Understanding Ability on Solving Mathematical Problems in Terms of Adversity Quotient

Fhuzi Kartin Astuti, U. Aripin
{"title":"Student’s Mathematical Understanding Ability on Solving Mathematical Problems in Terms of Adversity Quotient","authors":"Fhuzi Kartin Astuti, U. Aripin","doi":"10.22460/jiml.v5i3.11920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Education is one of the learning processes to improve a person's skills and behavior. Mathematical understanding is the ability to understand concepts, the ability to distinguish concepts, and the ability to calculate complex situations or problems. Adversity quotient is the response of a person or individual when faced with problems or difficulties in his life. The main problem in one of the schools in Sumedang is the students' thinking about mathematics lessons, where this lesson is less preferred than other lessons. The method used by this study is descriptive quantitative. This research was carried out in the even semester of 2021/2022, in one of the regional schools in Sumedang, class VII totaling 15 students. The data generated from this research is in the form of an instrument, which consists of indicators of students’ mathematical understanding and there are 3 questions on indicators of mathematical understanding. The methods of data collection in this study are as follows: 1) test descriptions of questions or instruments to determine students’ understanding abilities, 2) direct interviews with students. Research results from student answers according to students’ understanding abilities in terms of AQ, as follows:  1) The results of student responses in terms of Adversity Quotient as many as 3 Climber type students (high) the average percentage of students’ understanding ability is 80%, 2) The results of students responses in terms od Adversity Quotient as many as 9 Climber students (enough) the average percentage of students’ understanding ability is 5,77%, 3) The results of students responses in terms of the Adversity Quotient as many as 3 students Cumper type (medium)the average percentage of students’ understanding ability is 15,1%.","PeriodicalId":294861,"journal":{"name":"(JIML) JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE MATHEMATICS LEARNING","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"(JIML) JOURNAL OF INNOVATIVE MATHEMATICS LEARNING","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22460/jiml.v5i3.11920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Education is one of the learning processes to improve a person's skills and behavior. Mathematical understanding is the ability to understand concepts, the ability to distinguish concepts, and the ability to calculate complex situations or problems. Adversity quotient is the response of a person or individual when faced with problems or difficulties in his life. The main problem in one of the schools in Sumedang is the students' thinking about mathematics lessons, where this lesson is less preferred than other lessons. The method used by this study is descriptive quantitative. This research was carried out in the even semester of 2021/2022, in one of the regional schools in Sumedang, class VII totaling 15 students. The data generated from this research is in the form of an instrument, which consists of indicators of students’ mathematical understanding and there are 3 questions on indicators of mathematical understanding. The methods of data collection in this study are as follows: 1) test descriptions of questions or instruments to determine students’ understanding abilities, 2) direct interviews with students. Research results from student answers according to students’ understanding abilities in terms of AQ, as follows:  1) The results of student responses in terms of Adversity Quotient as many as 3 Climber type students (high) the average percentage of students’ understanding ability is 80%, 2) The results of students responses in terms od Adversity Quotient as many as 9 Climber students (enough) the average percentage of students’ understanding ability is 5,77%, 3) The results of students responses in terms of the Adversity Quotient as many as 3 students Cumper type (medium)the average percentage of students’ understanding ability is 15,1%.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从逆境商角度解题的学生数学理解能力
教育是提高一个人的技能和行为的学习过程之一。数学理解是理解概念的能力,区分概念的能力,以及计算复杂情况或问题的能力。逆境商是一个人或个人在面对生活中的问题或困难时的反应。Sumedang的一所学校的主要问题是学生对数学课的思考,这门课比其他课更不受欢迎。本研究采用描述性定量方法。本研究是在2021/2022的双学期进行的,在Sumedang的一所地方学校,七班共15名学生。本研究产生的数据以一个工具的形式,由学生的数学理解能力指标组成,数学理解能力指标有3个问题。本研究的数据收集方法如下:1)测试问题或工具的描述,以确定学生的理解能力,2)直接采访学生。研究结果从学生的回答根据学生的€™理解能力在AQ方面,如下:Â 1)学生回答的结果在逆境商方面多达3攀援型学生(高)学生的平均百分比的€™理解能力为80%,2)学生回答的结果在逆境商多达9攀援型学生(足够)学生的平均百分比的学生的€™理解能力为5.77%,3)结果学生在逆境商方面的回答多达3名学生,Cumper类型(中等)学生的平均理解能力百分比为15.1%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Analysis of Students’ Critical Thinking Ability in Solving Jumping Task Questions based on Learning Style The Development of Geometric Rows and Sequences Problem-Based Learning with Liveworksheet Media How Do Teachers Solve Problem With Contradiction Information? Study of Prospective Teachers - Professional Teachers in Solving IDEAL Model Problems The Implementation of Scientific Approach to Increase Mathematical Understanding Ability on Junior High School Students The Implementation of Scientific Approach to Improve Mathematical Understanding Ability on Junior High School Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1