Business process modeling: Vocabulary problem and requirements specification

J. Gassen, J. Mendling, L. Thom, J. Oliveira
{"title":"Business process modeling: Vocabulary problem and requirements specification","authors":"J. Gassen, J. Mendling, L. Thom, J. Oliveira","doi":"10.1145/2666216.2666217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Process models are composed of graphical elements and words. However, words used to name elements during process design have potentially ambiguous meanings, which might result in quality problems. We believe that ontologies might serve as a means to address this problem. This paper discusses aspects related to words used to represent concepts in labels and why ontologies can improve this representation. Also, we analyze how the requirements specifications can influence the terms used during modeling. The discussion regarding ontologies is conceptual. We performed an experiment to analyze empirically the vocabulary problem in the context of process models. In the experiment the selection of terms represented with different levels of explicitness in requirements specifications is evaluated. Our findings suggest that the vocabulary problem occurs in process models. Also, different levels of explicitness affect the labels but are not sufficient to solve the vocabulary problem.","PeriodicalId":393730,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on The Design of Communication CD-ROM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on The Design of Communication CD-ROM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2666216.2666217","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Process models are composed of graphical elements and words. However, words used to name elements during process design have potentially ambiguous meanings, which might result in quality problems. We believe that ontologies might serve as a means to address this problem. This paper discusses aspects related to words used to represent concepts in labels and why ontologies can improve this representation. Also, we analyze how the requirements specifications can influence the terms used during modeling. The discussion regarding ontologies is conceptual. We performed an experiment to analyze empirically the vocabulary problem in the context of process models. In the experiment the selection of terms represented with different levels of explicitness in requirements specifications is evaluated. Our findings suggest that the vocabulary problem occurs in process models. Also, different levels of explicitness affect the labels but are not sufficient to solve the vocabulary problem.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
业务流程建模:词汇问题和需求规范
流程模型由图形元素和单词组成。然而,在工艺设计期间用于命名元素的单词具有潜在的模糊含义,这可能导致质量问题。我们相信本体可以作为解决这个问题的一种手段。本文讨论了与用于在标签中表示概念的单词相关的方面,以及为什么本体可以改进这种表示。此外,我们还分析了需求规范如何影响建模过程中使用的术语。关于本体的讨论是概念性的。我们进行了一项实验,对过程模型背景下的词汇问题进行了实证分析。在实验中,评估了需求规范中以不同显式水平表示的术语的选择。我们的研究结果表明,词汇问题发生在过程模型中。此外,不同程度的显式影响标签,但不足以解决词汇问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evidence of Things Not Seen: Mapping Sentiment in Unstructured Texts about the Herbicide 'Agent Orange' Architect, Developer, Designer: The Anatomy of UX in Industry Job Postings A Mobile Banking Model in the Cloud for Financial Inclusion in India Rhetorical Functions of Hashtag Forms Across Social Media Applications Social Justice in Technologies of Prenatal Care: Toward a User Centered Approach to Technical Communication in Home Pregnancy Testing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1