Delinking from Victimhood and Other Rivalries

Tlostanova
{"title":"Delinking from Victimhood and Other Rivalries","authors":"Tlostanova","doi":"10.13169/intecritdivestud.2.1.0092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"She focuses on decolonial thought, feminisms of the Global South, postsocialist sensibilities, fiction and art. Her most recent books include and What Does it Mean to be Post-Soviet? Decolonial Art from the Ruins of the Soviet Empire (Duke University Press, 2018) and A New Political Imagination. Making the Case , co-authored with Tony Fry (Routledge 2020). ABSTRACT Contemporary political, economic and social institutions have no adequate tools to deal with diversity and tend to see it as a challenge. The unresolved evils of modernity that neoliberal globalization attempted to lacquer in its first triumphant years, have reemerged with full force confirming the discriminatory nature of the global culture, its unfair conditions of inclusion through erasing identities or through their commercialization. The overwhelming negative sensibility marking the present darker stage of neoliberal globalization, is not a brotherhood but merely a condition of fellow sufferers who have not fully realized that we are in the same boat and need to cooperate rather than compete to survive. The opinion article addresses the danger of multiplying victimhood rivalries as a manifestation of the modern/ colonial agonistics. This position replaces politics with manipulative moral zeal and withdraws the dimension of the future as a collective existential condition from the horizon. Delinking from victimhood rivalries is a difficult but urgent task of transcending modernity and looking for other options and other worlds intricately correlating and interacting in a complex pluriverse.","PeriodicalId":224459,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Diversity Studies","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Diversity Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13169/intecritdivestud.2.1.0092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

She focuses on decolonial thought, feminisms of the Global South, postsocialist sensibilities, fiction and art. Her most recent books include and What Does it Mean to be Post-Soviet? Decolonial Art from the Ruins of the Soviet Empire (Duke University Press, 2018) and A New Political Imagination. Making the Case , co-authored with Tony Fry (Routledge 2020). ABSTRACT Contemporary political, economic and social institutions have no adequate tools to deal with diversity and tend to see it as a challenge. The unresolved evils of modernity that neoliberal globalization attempted to lacquer in its first triumphant years, have reemerged with full force confirming the discriminatory nature of the global culture, its unfair conditions of inclusion through erasing identities or through their commercialization. The overwhelming negative sensibility marking the present darker stage of neoliberal globalization, is not a brotherhood but merely a condition of fellow sufferers who have not fully realized that we are in the same boat and need to cooperate rather than compete to survive. The opinion article addresses the danger of multiplying victimhood rivalries as a manifestation of the modern/ colonial agonistics. This position replaces politics with manipulative moral zeal and withdraws the dimension of the future as a collective existential condition from the horizon. Delinking from victimhood rivalries is a difficult but urgent task of transcending modernity and looking for other options and other worlds intricately correlating and interacting in a complex pluriverse.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从受害者和其他竞争中分离出来
她专注于非殖民思想、全球南方的女权主义、后社会主义情感、小说和艺术。她最近的著作包括《后苏联时代意味着什么?》从苏联帝国的废墟去殖民艺术(杜克大学出版社,2018)和一个新的政治想象。与托尼·弗莱合著的《制造案例》(Routledge 2020)。当代的政治、经济和社会机构没有足够的工具来处理多样性,并且倾向于将其视为一种挑战。新自由主义全球化在其最初的胜利岁月里试图抹去的未解决的现代性罪恶,已经以充分的力量重新出现,确认了全球文化的歧视性本质,通过抹去身份或通过身份的商业化,其不公平的包容条件。在新自由主义全球化的当前黑暗阶段,压倒性的消极情感标志着一种兄弟情谊,而仅仅是一种没有完全意识到我们在同一条船上,需要合作而不是竞争来生存的同病相重的情况。这篇评论文章指出,作为现代/殖民斗争的一种表现,受害者对抗成倍增加的危险。这一立场用操纵性的道德热情取代了政治,并从地平线上撤回了作为集体存在条件的未来维度。脱离受害者的对抗是一项艰难而紧迫的任务,它超越现代性,寻找其他选择和其他世界,在一个复杂的多元宇宙中错综复杂地相互关联和相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
International Journal of Critical Diversity Studies University Leaders as Inhibitors or Influencers of Systemic Change for Marginalised Youth Another World Exploring the Use of South African Ethnic and Racial Slurs on Social Media Hegemonic Masculinity in K. Sello Duiker's The Quiet Violence of Dreams
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1