Pedestrians’ Mental Model Development after Initial Encounters with Automated Driving Systems

Philip Joisten, Sarah Schwindt, Nina Theobald, Bettina Abendroth
{"title":"Pedestrians’ Mental Model Development after Initial Encounters with Automated Driving Systems","authors":"Philip Joisten, Sarah Schwindt, Nina Theobald, Bettina Abendroth","doi":"10.1145/3552327.3552331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automated driving systems (ADS) in urban road traffic incorporate external human-machine interfaces (eHMI) as explicit means of interaction with pedestrians. To enable safe interactions, a pedestrian’s mental model must be consistent with the functions and limitations of the ADS. The aim of this research is to investigate developments in pedestrians’ mental models towards ADS displaying different levels of automation transparency (AT) via an eHMI. Thirty-seven participants were instructed about ADS and experienced 60 interactions with an ADS on three test days (longitudinal design) in a controlled field test environment. As between-subject variable the level of AT was manipulated (status information vs. status, perception and yielding intention information). As dependent variable the mental model was measured by means of a questionnaire. The study results show that a pedestrian’s mental model of an ADS does not develop within the three initial encounters but is initially influenced by the level of AT conveyed via an eHMI. Participants in the high AT group assessed the ADS’s ability to communicate its yielding and nonyielding intention as more applicable. When designing eHMIs and instructing pedestrians accordingly, misconceptions in the pedestrians’ mental model should be considered.","PeriodicalId":370674,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 33rd European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","volume":"198 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 33rd European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3552327.3552331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Automated driving systems (ADS) in urban road traffic incorporate external human-machine interfaces (eHMI) as explicit means of interaction with pedestrians. To enable safe interactions, a pedestrian’s mental model must be consistent with the functions and limitations of the ADS. The aim of this research is to investigate developments in pedestrians’ mental models towards ADS displaying different levels of automation transparency (AT) via an eHMI. Thirty-seven participants were instructed about ADS and experienced 60 interactions with an ADS on three test days (longitudinal design) in a controlled field test environment. As between-subject variable the level of AT was manipulated (status information vs. status, perception and yielding intention information). As dependent variable the mental model was measured by means of a questionnaire. The study results show that a pedestrian’s mental model of an ADS does not develop within the three initial encounters but is initially influenced by the level of AT conveyed via an eHMI. Participants in the high AT group assessed the ADS’s ability to communicate its yielding and nonyielding intention as more applicable. When designing eHMIs and instructing pedestrians accordingly, misconceptions in the pedestrians’ mental model should be considered.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行人初次接触自动驾驶系统后的心理模型发展
城市道路交通中的自动驾驶系统(ADS)将外部人机界面(eHMI)作为与行人交互的明确手段。为了实现安全的互动,行人的心理模型必须与自动驾驶系统的功能和局限性保持一致。本研究的目的是通过eHMI调查行人对自动驾驶系统显示不同程度的自动化透明度(AT)的心理模型的发展。37名参与者在受控的现场测试环境中接受了有关ADS的指导,并在3天(纵向设计)的测试中体验了60次与ADS的互动。作为被试间变量,AT的水平被操纵(状态信息与状态、知觉和屈服意向信息)。心理模型作为因变量,采用问卷法进行测量。研究结果表明,行人对ADS的心理模型不会在最初的三次接触中发展,而是最初受到通过eHMI传递的AT水平的影响。高AT组的参与者评估ADS传达其收益和不收益意图的能力更适用。在设计eHMIs并对行人进行相应的指导时,应考虑到行人心理模型中的误解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
How an Undergraduate Group of Design Students Solved Wiring Errors during the Prototyping of an Interactive Artifact The pause that refreshes: Break-taking occurs when task demands are reduced allowing for replenishing of attentional resources The Design of an Experiment to Evaluate the Effect of Spatial Sound on Memory Recall in a Virtual Reality Learning Environment Haptic feedback in first person shooter video games Wait a second! Assessing the impact of different desktop push notification types on software developers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1