Window: Spatializing Occupation

Niharika Pandit
{"title":"Window: Spatializing Occupation","authors":"Niharika Pandit","doi":"10.28968/cftt.v9i1.39407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this short intervention, I ask, What is at stake, politically and conceptually, in understanding militarism not as stable and unfolding similarly across geographies, but as deeply contingent on historical and contextual specificities? How might we then unpack the question of home becoming a catalyst of militarism? What constitutes home under saturated state control and occupation where militarism is neither subtle nor benign but enforced through violence? Emplacing the vignette of a window that came up during my ethnographic fieldwork in Srinagar, Kashmir, I reflect on the conditions of gendered vulnerability, fear, violence, and everyday negotiations of survival that become urgent concerns for people surviving a colonial occupation.\nThis essay is a part of the Roundtable called “The Housewife’s Secret Arsenal” (henceforth HSA); a collection of eight object-oriented engagements focusing on particular material instantiations of domesticated war. The title of this roundtable is deliberately tongue-in-cheek reminding readers of the many ways that militarisms can be invisible to their users yet persistent in the form of mundane household items that aid in the labor of homemaking. Juxtaposing the deliberately stereotyped “housewife” with the theater of war raises questions about the quiet migration of these objects and technologies from battlefield to kitchen, or bathroom, or garden. Gathered together as an “arsenal,” their uncanny proximity to one another becomes a key critical tool in asking how war comes to find itself at home in our lives.","PeriodicalId":316008,"journal":{"name":"Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v9i1.39407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this short intervention, I ask, What is at stake, politically and conceptually, in understanding militarism not as stable and unfolding similarly across geographies, but as deeply contingent on historical and contextual specificities? How might we then unpack the question of home becoming a catalyst of militarism? What constitutes home under saturated state control and occupation where militarism is neither subtle nor benign but enforced through violence? Emplacing the vignette of a window that came up during my ethnographic fieldwork in Srinagar, Kashmir, I reflect on the conditions of gendered vulnerability, fear, violence, and everyday negotiations of survival that become urgent concerns for people surviving a colonial occupation. This essay is a part of the Roundtable called “The Housewife’s Secret Arsenal” (henceforth HSA); a collection of eight object-oriented engagements focusing on particular material instantiations of domesticated war. The title of this roundtable is deliberately tongue-in-cheek reminding readers of the many ways that militarisms can be invisible to their users yet persistent in the form of mundane household items that aid in the labor of homemaking. Juxtaposing the deliberately stereotyped “housewife” with the theater of war raises questions about the quiet migration of these objects and technologies from battlefield to kitchen, or bathroom, or garden. Gathered together as an “arsenal,” their uncanny proximity to one another becomes a key critical tool in asking how war comes to find itself at home in our lives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
窗口:空间化职业
在这段简短的发言中,我提出了一个问题:在政治上和概念上,把军国主义理解为一种深深依赖于历史和背景的特殊性,而不是一种稳定的、跨地域的类似发展,这其中的利害关系是什么?那么,我们该如何解释家园成为军国主义催化剂的问题呢?在军国主义既不微妙也不温和,而是通过暴力强制执行的饱和状态下,什么构成了家?我在克什米尔的斯利那加(Srinagar)进行人种学田野调查时,看到了一扇窗户上的小插图,我把它放在这里,反思性别上的脆弱、恐惧、暴力和日常生存谈判的状况,这些都成为殖民占领下幸存者迫切关注的问题。这篇文章是圆桌会议“家庭主妇的秘密军火库”(以下简称HSA)的一部分;八个面向对象的交战的集合,集中于驯化战争的特定物质实例。这个圆桌会议的标题故意半开玩笑地提醒读者,军国主义可以在许多方面对他们的用户来说是不可见的,但却以帮助家务劳动的日常家居用品的形式持续存在。将刻意塑造的“家庭主妇”与战场并置,引发了人们对这些物品和技术从战场到厨房、浴室或花园的悄然迁移的质疑。作为“武器库”聚集在一起,他们彼此之间不可思议的接近成为一个关键的工具,用来询问战争如何在我们的生活中找到自己的家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Inheritance of Militarization: Toxic Gifts, Furtive Critique, and Survivance in Post-War Bosnia Book Review | Weighing the Future: Race, Science, and Pregnancy Trials in the Postgenomic Era by Natali Valdez (University of California Press, 2022) Data Surrogates as Hosts: Politics of Environmental Governance Moral Economies of Life and Death: Agricultural Improvement, Imperialism, and Chemical Kinships with Reactive Nitrogen Homing Toxicity: The Domestication of Herbicidal Warfare
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1