HOW SAFE ARE WE? SHAPING EUROPEAN ECONOMY BY GEOPOLITICAL SHOCKS

A. Papastamou
{"title":"HOW SAFE ARE WE? SHAPING EUROPEAN ECONOMY BY GEOPOLITICAL SHOCKS","authors":"A. Papastamou","doi":"10.32752/1993-6788-2023-1-261-43-50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Could we measure the impact of geopolitical shocks, such as the Russian invasion of Ukraine and COVID19. on shaping economic diplomacy and investor decisions? This is the question that runs through this study. We are attempting to highlight and identify the vital interconnections between the economy as reflected in the functioning of a state's stock market and the geopolitical risks it faces, attempting to draw useful conclusions for economic diplomacy. The economic analysis of geopolitical risks and its integration into the economic policy framework is a major concern of the current scientific research and therein lies the value of the present study. By statistically exploiting data from 2000 for the countries facing strong geopolitical risks: the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China & South Africa), MENA (Middle East & North Africa countries: Algeria, Bahrain, Djibouti, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Palestinian Authority, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates & Yemen) and SAHEL (four countries bordering Lake Chad - Cameroon, Chad, Niger, Nigeria – as well as Burkina Faso, The Gambia, Guinea, Mali, Mauritania, and Senegal), but also for the G7 countries (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, & the US, as well as the European Union) due to their involvement in geopolitical crises (either through peacekeeping missions and development aid or by sending military equipment), it is possible to analyse the effects of geopolitical risks on the functioning of their economies, as reflected in stock market fluctuations. The conclusions are twofold: they feed the information \"arsenal\" for shaping economic diplomacy, and at the same time help investors to protect themselves from geopolitical risks by diversifying their investment portfolio.","PeriodicalId":115867,"journal":{"name":"Actual Problems of Economics","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actual Problems of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32752/1993-6788-2023-1-261-43-50","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Could we measure the impact of geopolitical shocks, such as the Russian invasion of Ukraine and COVID19. on shaping economic diplomacy and investor decisions? This is the question that runs through this study. We are attempting to highlight and identify the vital interconnections between the economy as reflected in the functioning of a state's stock market and the geopolitical risks it faces, attempting to draw useful conclusions for economic diplomacy. The economic analysis of geopolitical risks and its integration into the economic policy framework is a major concern of the current scientific research and therein lies the value of the present study. By statistically exploiting data from 2000 for the countries facing strong geopolitical risks: the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China & South Africa), MENA (Middle East & North Africa countries: Algeria, Bahrain, Djibouti, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Palestinian Authority, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates & Yemen) and SAHEL (four countries bordering Lake Chad - Cameroon, Chad, Niger, Nigeria – as well as Burkina Faso, The Gambia, Guinea, Mali, Mauritania, and Senegal), but also for the G7 countries (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, & the US, as well as the European Union) due to their involvement in geopolitical crises (either through peacekeeping missions and development aid or by sending military equipment), it is possible to analyse the effects of geopolitical risks on the functioning of their economies, as reflected in stock market fluctuations. The conclusions are twofold: they feed the information "arsenal" for shaping economic diplomacy, and at the same time help investors to protect themselves from geopolitical risks by diversifying their investment portfolio.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们有多安全?地缘政治冲击塑造欧洲经济
我们能否衡量地缘政治冲击的影响,比如俄罗斯入侵乌克兰和2019冠状病毒病?如何塑造经济外交和投资者决策?这是贯穿整个研究的问题。我们正试图强调并确定一个国家股市运作所反映的经济与其面临的地缘政治风险之间的重要联系,试图为经济外交得出有用的结论。地缘政治风险的经济分析及其与经济政策框架的整合是当前科学研究的主要关注点,也是本研究的价值所在。通过统计利用2000年面临强烈地缘政治风险的国家的数据:金砖国家(巴西,俄罗斯,印度,中国和南非),中东和北非国家:阿尔及利亚、巴林、吉布提、埃及、伊拉克、约旦、科威特、黎巴嫩、利比亚、毛里塔尼亚、摩洛哥、阿曼、巴勒斯坦权力机构、卡塔尔、沙特阿拉伯、叙利亚、突尼斯、阿拉伯联合酋长国和也门)和萨赫勒(乍得湖沿岸的四个国家——喀麦隆、乍得、尼日尔、尼日利亚——以及布基纳法索、冈比亚、几内亚、马里、毛里塔尼亚和塞内加尔),以及七国集团国家(加拿大、法国、德国、意大利、日本、英国和美国),由于它们卷入了地缘政治危机(无论是通过维持和平特派团和发展援助,还是通过提供军事装备),因此有可能分析地缘政治风险对其经济运行的影响,正如股市波动所反映的那样。结论是双重的:它们为塑造经济外交提供了信息“武器库”,同时帮助投资者通过分散投资组合来保护自己免受地缘政治风险的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF DESTABILIZATION OF THE BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT FEATURES OF THE SPACE OF NEUROMARKETING SENSORY TECHNOLOGIES THE ROLE OF STRATEGIC PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN THE FIELD OF CULTURE IN UKRAINE DURING THE WAR DNA AND THE BRAND PYRAMID AS COMPONENTS OF MARKETING TOOLS FOR INFLUENCE ON CONSUMER BEHAVIOR DEVELOPMENT OF A MODEL FOR THE FORMALIZATION OF THE PROCESS OF DETECTING INSIDER CYBER THREATS IN BANKS: AN ONTOLOGICAL APPROACH
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1