The Role of Morality in the Diplomatic Activity of Selected Politicians in the 20th Century

K. Cynk
{"title":"The Role of Morality in the Diplomatic Activity of Selected Politicians in the 20th Century","authors":"K. Cynk","doi":"10.37837/2707-7683-2021-38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of article is to describe the role of ethics and morality in foreign policy and diplomacy. The article is theoretical. The introduction defines the concept of morality and presents the main research questions and hypotheses. The first part of this text presents general moral criteria for determining what human actions are right and what are wrong. Also presented are the types of motivations that most often affect politicians when making certain decisions in diplomatic activity. The second part of the article presents three profiles of famous politicians who in the 20th century acted in accordance with the voice of conscience and moral principles in their foreign policy. They are Mahatma Gandhi, India’s social leader in 1920–1948, Willy Brandt, Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany in 1969–1974, and Jimmy Carter, U.S. President in 1977–1981.\nUsing theoretical analysis, the generalisation of scientific facts and research findings, the author, on the basis of the reflection method, has described and analysed the motives that guided the three politicians in making difficult political decisions in specific historical situations. Understanding such motives is important because the measures adopted on the basis of them have had consequences not only for politicians but also for citizens and, sometimes, even for the entire world. As a result of the analysis, in the case of Gandhi, the following hypothesis has been confirmed: The voice of conscience to which politicians heed and its meaning are mostly associated with the historical and cultural context, unique for each country. In the case of Brandt and Carter, the author has verified the hypothesis that very often conscience and career motivation propose the same way of acting, which is why we cannot exclude career motivation in such a situation.\nKeywords: morality, conscience, policy, diplomacy, foreign policy, sociology of morality.","PeriodicalId":175721,"journal":{"name":"Diplomatic Ukraine","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diplomatic Ukraine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37837/2707-7683-2021-38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of article is to describe the role of ethics and morality in foreign policy and diplomacy. The article is theoretical. The introduction defines the concept of morality and presents the main research questions and hypotheses. The first part of this text presents general moral criteria for determining what human actions are right and what are wrong. Also presented are the types of motivations that most often affect politicians when making certain decisions in diplomatic activity. The second part of the article presents three profiles of famous politicians who in the 20th century acted in accordance with the voice of conscience and moral principles in their foreign policy. They are Mahatma Gandhi, India’s social leader in 1920–1948, Willy Brandt, Chancellor of the Federal Republic of Germany in 1969–1974, and Jimmy Carter, U.S. President in 1977–1981. Using theoretical analysis, the generalisation of scientific facts and research findings, the author, on the basis of the reflection method, has described and analysed the motives that guided the three politicians in making difficult political decisions in specific historical situations. Understanding such motives is important because the measures adopted on the basis of them have had consequences not only for politicians but also for citizens and, sometimes, even for the entire world. As a result of the analysis, in the case of Gandhi, the following hypothesis has been confirmed: The voice of conscience to which politicians heed and its meaning are mostly associated with the historical and cultural context, unique for each country. In the case of Brandt and Carter, the author has verified the hypothesis that very often conscience and career motivation propose the same way of acting, which is why we cannot exclude career motivation in such a situation. Keywords: morality, conscience, policy, diplomacy, foreign policy, sociology of morality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
道德在20世纪政治家外交活动中的作用
这篇文章的目的是描述伦理和道德在外交政策和外交中的作用。这篇文章是理论性的。引言部分界定了道德的概念,提出了主要的研究问题和假设。本文的第一部分介绍了确定人类行为是对是错的一般道德标准。还介绍了在外交活动中做出某些决定时最常影响政治家的动机类型。文章的第二部分介绍了三位20世纪在外交政策中根据良心和道德原则行事的著名政治家。他们分别是1920-1948年的印度社会领袖圣雄甘地、1969-1974年的德意志联邦共和国总理维利·勃兰特和1977-1981年的美国总统吉米·卡特。作者运用理论分析、对科学事实和研究成果的概括,在反思方法的基础上,描述和分析了在特定历史情况下指导三位政治家做出艰难政治决策的动机。了解这些动机是很重要的,因为在这些动机的基础上采取的措施不仅对政治家,而且对公民,有时甚至对整个世界都产生了影响。分析的结果是,在甘地的案例中,以下假设得到了证实:政治家所听从的良心的声音及其意义大多与历史和文化背景有关,每个国家都是独特的。在Brandt和Carter的案例中,作者已经验证了一个假设,即良知和职业动机经常提出相同的行为方式,这就是为什么我们不能在这种情况下排除职业动机。关键词:道德,良心,政策,外交,外交政策,道德社会学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Military-Political Alliance and Diplomatic Cooperation of the UPR and the WUPR Activities of the Embassy of the Argentine Republic in Ukraine Ontological Aspects of the russia-Ukraine War His Contribution to the Development of Ukrainian Diplomacy should not be forgotten The Kremlin Chemical Cartwheels (From the History of Negotiations on the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1