A comparative study between Patwardhan technique and push & pull method in women undergoing second stage of labor

Gargi Deshmukh, Tapan Bandyopadhyay, A. Kakade, A. Ghosh
{"title":"A comparative study between Patwardhan technique and push & pull method in women undergoing second stage of labor","authors":"Gargi Deshmukh, Tapan Bandyopadhyay, A. Kakade, A. Ghosh","doi":"10.15406/ipcb.2022.08.00268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Obstructed labor with the fetal head impacted in the pelvis is an obstetric complication that requires caesarean delivery with skilful handling in an organized manner to avoid serious maternal and neonatal morbidity. The present study was undertaken to compare the Patwardhan technique with push and pull methods and also to evaluate the safety of Patwardhan technique. Material & methods: Study based on a total 90 pregnant women, of age 18 – 35 years with singleton pregnancy in second stage of labor with deeply impacted head, cases examined in labor room who gave consent and fulfilled inclusion criteria including inpatient admissions and referral randomly allocated in three groups 30 each.1. Patwardhan technique. 2. Push Technique 3. Pull technique. Results: Age, gestational age and duration of labor of the subjects in three were similar. There was significantly less incidence of uterine incision extension to either side, board ligament hematoma, intra-operative blood loss and traumatic Postpartum hemorrhage in subjects undergoing Patwardhan’s technique. With regards to neonatal outcome, wound infection, foetal injury and mean duration of hospital stay were significantly less in Patwardhan’s technique. Birth weight and APGAR scores were similar in all groups. Conclusion: There was less incidence of maternal and foetal morbidity in Patwardhan’s technique which makes it a preferred choice for management during second stage of labor","PeriodicalId":211817,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pregnancy & Child Birth","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pregnancy & Child Birth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/ipcb.2022.08.00268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Obstructed labor with the fetal head impacted in the pelvis is an obstetric complication that requires caesarean delivery with skilful handling in an organized manner to avoid serious maternal and neonatal morbidity. The present study was undertaken to compare the Patwardhan technique with push and pull methods and also to evaluate the safety of Patwardhan technique. Material & methods: Study based on a total 90 pregnant women, of age 18 – 35 years with singleton pregnancy in second stage of labor with deeply impacted head, cases examined in labor room who gave consent and fulfilled inclusion criteria including inpatient admissions and referral randomly allocated in three groups 30 each.1. Patwardhan technique. 2. Push Technique 3. Pull technique. Results: Age, gestational age and duration of labor of the subjects in three were similar. There was significantly less incidence of uterine incision extension to either side, board ligament hematoma, intra-operative blood loss and traumatic Postpartum hemorrhage in subjects undergoing Patwardhan’s technique. With regards to neonatal outcome, wound infection, foetal injury and mean duration of hospital stay were significantly less in Patwardhan’s technique. Birth weight and APGAR scores were similar in all groups. Conclusion: There was less incidence of maternal and foetal morbidity in Patwardhan’s technique which makes it a preferred choice for management during second stage of labor
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
帕特瓦丹法与推拉法在产妇第二产程中的比较研究
导语:胎头嵌塞在骨盆中的难产是一种产科并发症,需要有组织的熟练处理的剖宫产,以避免严重的孕产妇和新生儿发病率。本研究是为了比较帕特瓦尔丹技术与推拉方法,并评估帕特瓦尔丹技术的安全性。材料与方法:研究对象为90例年龄在18 - 35岁的二产程单胎妊娠且头部深度撞击的孕妇,在产房检查,同意并符合住院和转诊标准的病例,随机分为三组,每组30例1。Patwardhan技术。2. 3.推法把技术。结果:3例产妇年龄、胎龄、产程相近。采用Patwardhan技术的患者子宫切口向两侧延伸、板韧带血肿、术中出血量及外伤性产后出血的发生率均明显降低。在新生儿结局方面,Patwardhan技术的伤口感染、胎儿损伤和平均住院时间显著缩短。各组出生体重和APGAR评分相似。结论:帕特瓦丹法产妇和胎儿发病率低,是第二产程处理的首选方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Risk factors for spontaneous preterm deliveries above twenty-eight complete weeks of gestation Policy on healthy practices to improve the nutritional status of children under 5 years of age Matrix for understanding perinatal psychic processes mediated by assisted reproductive technology Paternal depression as an unrecognizable symptom by public policies and mental health Ovarian artery Doppler velocimetry effects after myoinositol and lipoic acid therapy in PCOs patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1