ETHNIC COMPONENT OF SOCIAL CONFLICT: CONCEPTUAL GAPS OF INTERPRETATION

O. Persidskaya
{"title":"ETHNIC COMPONENT OF SOCIAL CONFLICT: CONCEPTUAL GAPS OF INTERPRETATION","authors":"O. Persidskaya","doi":"10.47850/S.2020.1.73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Various terms that are most often used in scientific literature when describing conflicts between representa-tives of different ethnic groups are considered. The conceptual gaps in the interpretation of these terms are revealed: categorical synonymy, theoretical and methodological reduction, epistemological isolation and ideological burden. To solve this epistemological difficulty, it is proposed to abandon a single term, but to focus on the analysis of social conflict, revealing its diverse ethnic component.","PeriodicalId":370810,"journal":{"name":"Respublica literaria","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respublica literaria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47850/S.2020.1.73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Various terms that are most often used in scientific literature when describing conflicts between representa-tives of different ethnic groups are considered. The conceptual gaps in the interpretation of these terms are revealed: categorical synonymy, theoretical and methodological reduction, epistemological isolation and ideological burden. To solve this epistemological difficulty, it is proposed to abandon a single term, but to focus on the analysis of social conflict, revealing its diverse ethnic component.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会冲突的种族成分:解释的概念差距
考虑到科学文献中描述不同种族群体代表之间冲突时最常用的各种术语。揭示了这些术语在解释上的概念空白:范畴同义、理论和方法上的还原、认识论上的孤立和意识形态上的负担。为解决这一认识论上的困难,建议放弃单一术语,而着重分析社会冲突,揭示其多元的族群成分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Classical philosophy in Novosibirsk Scientific Center. The pages of history The Philosophical Studies in Antiquity: Chapter of History THE CONCEPT OF UTILITY IN CHARLES SANDERS PEIRCE'S PRAGMATISM IN A LABYRINTH OF CONTEXTS. Book Review: Philosophy and Its History. Discussions: Textbook / editor, introduction, translation and comments by M. N. Volf. Novosibirsk, 2021. 239 p. COMPARATIVE CONCEPTOLOGY OF POWER AND RESISTANCE USING GOOGLE NGRAM BOOKS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1