An analysis of requirements evolution in open source projects: recommendations for issue trackers

P. Heck, A. Zaidman
{"title":"An analysis of requirements evolution in open source projects: recommendations for issue trackers","authors":"P. Heck, A. Zaidman","doi":"10.1145/2501543.2501550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While requirements for open source projects originate from a variety of sources like e.g. mailing lists or blogs, typically, they eventually end up as feature requests in an issue tracking system. When analyzing how these issue trackers are used for requirements evolution, we witnessed a high percentage of duplicates in a number of high-prole projects. Further investigation of six open source projects and their users led us to a number of important observations and a categorization of the root causes of these duplicates. Based on this, we propose a set of improvements for future issue tracking systems.","PeriodicalId":321820,"journal":{"name":"International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2501543.2501550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

While requirements for open source projects originate from a variety of sources like e.g. mailing lists or blogs, typically, they eventually end up as feature requests in an issue tracking system. When analyzing how these issue trackers are used for requirements evolution, we witnessed a high percentage of duplicates in a number of high-prole projects. Further investigation of six open source projects and their users led us to a number of important observations and a categorization of the root causes of these duplicates. Based on this, we propose a set of improvements for future issue tracking systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开源项目中需求演变的分析:对问题跟踪器的建议
虽然开源项目的需求来自各种各样的来源,比如邮件列表或博客,但通常情况下,它们最终会在问题跟踪系统中以特性请求的形式结束。在分析如何将这些问题跟踪器用于需求演变时,我们发现在许多重要的项目中存在很高比例的重复项。对六个开源项目及其用户的进一步调查使我们得到了许多重要的观察结果,并对这些重复的根本原因进行了分类。在此基础上,我们为未来的问题跟踪系统提出了一组改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Applying lehman's laws to game evolution Enhancement of CRD-based clone tracking Identifying clone removal opportunities based on co-evolution analysis What can commit metadata tell us about design degradation? Tracking performance failures with rizel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1