Analysis of 74 Open Globe Injuries Requiring Vitreo-Retinal Intervention and Its Correlation with Ocular Trauma Score

Girish A. Gadre, Prashant Bulchandani
{"title":"Analysis of 74 Open Globe Injuries Requiring Vitreo-Retinal Intervention and Its Correlation with Ocular Trauma Score","authors":"Girish A. Gadre, Prashant Bulchandani","doi":"10.9734/or/2022/v17i130249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Retrospective study of 74 eyes with open globe injuries requiring V-R Intervention & its correlation with ocular trauma score. \nResults: Commonest cause of injury: Hammer-chisel/stone in 32.43% (24) & Thorn/wooden stick 27% (20). Average age-30.5yrs. Average interval between trauma & intervention was -10.04days (4hrs – 52days). \nDiscussion: Delay of presentation to ophthalmologist has lot of significance,high incidence of endophthalmitis & retinal detachment compared to other studies. Surgical outcome shows lower incidence of NO Light Perception & Significant reduction in number of cases with </=HM. Patients had better prognosis & visual outcome, higher incidence of 1/200- 20/50; 35.14% cases with >20/200. 60% of our cases had traumatic cataract, visual acuity may be underestimated in traumatic cataract. Faulty Projection of rays probably would be better criteria than RAPD. Extension of wound beyond pars plana, and aniridia (6.7%) are important risk factor. \nConclusion: Modification of raw points is recommended in OTS criteria in Indian scenario.","PeriodicalId":287685,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmology Research: An International Journal","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmology Research: An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9734/or/2022/v17i130249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Retrospective study of 74 eyes with open globe injuries requiring V-R Intervention & its correlation with ocular trauma score. Results: Commonest cause of injury: Hammer-chisel/stone in 32.43% (24) & Thorn/wooden stick 27% (20). Average age-30.5yrs. Average interval between trauma & intervention was -10.04days (4hrs – 52days). Discussion: Delay of presentation to ophthalmologist has lot of significance,high incidence of endophthalmitis & retinal detachment compared to other studies. Surgical outcome shows lower incidence of NO Light Perception & Significant reduction in number of cases with 20/200. 60% of our cases had traumatic cataract, visual acuity may be underestimated in traumatic cataract. Faulty Projection of rays probably would be better criteria than RAPD. Extension of wound beyond pars plana, and aniridia (6.7%) are important risk factor. Conclusion: Modification of raw points is recommended in OTS criteria in Indian scenario.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
74例玻璃体-视网膜介入治疗的开放性眼球损伤及其与眼外伤评分的相关性分析
目的:回顾性分析74只眼球开放性损伤需要V-R介入治疗的眼及其与眼外伤评分的关系。结果:最常见的伤源:锤凿/石头占32.43%(24),刺/木棍占27%(20)。平均年龄- 30.5岁。创伤与干预之间的平均间隔为-10.04天(4小时- 52天)。讨论:延迟向眼科就诊具有重要意义,与其他研究相比,眼内炎和视网膜脱离的发生率较高。手术结果显示NO光感发生率降低,20/200病例数显著减少。60%的病例为外伤性白内障,外伤性白内障的视敏度可能被低估。射线投射错误可能是比RAPD更好的诊断标准。创面延伸及无虹膜(6.7%)是重要的危险因素。结论:建议在印度的OTS标准中修改原始穴位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Drug-induced Cornea Verticillata: A Report of 2 Cases Sustainable Development Goals and Eye Care in Nigeria Clinical Profile of Ocular Trauma at a Tertiary Care Hospital Amplitude of Accommodation in Young Caucasian Adults in Greece Antimicrobial and Immunostimulatory Effects of Senna occidentalis Ethanolic Extract against Aspergillus flavus-Induced Mycotic Keratitis: A Promising Therapeutic Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1