CLOZE TECHNIQUE AND READING PROFICIENCY: CAUSAL COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS TO ELEVENTH GRADERS

Mega Sanja Imelda, A. S. B. Ningrum, S. Wahyuni
{"title":"CLOZE TECHNIQUE AND READING PROFICIENCY: CAUSAL COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS TO ELEVENTH GRADERS","authors":"Mega Sanja Imelda, A. S. B. Ningrum, S. Wahyuni","doi":"10.33508/mgs.v50i1.3552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The reading proficiency of Indonesian students is still relatively low, especially the reading performance in English as a foreign language. Thus, it needs several explorations on the technique suitable for students with diversities of reading competence. This study describes the effect of implementing the cloze procedure on teaching reading proficiency. The research method employed the design of quantitative causal-comparative. The population is the students of the second grade of senior high school with the samples involving two classes. To collect the data, the pre-test and post-test were applied to the classes. The result of the test was analyzed by using ANCOVA. The result shows that the sig. is higher than 0.05 (0.92 > 0.05). It reveals that the cloze procedure is not significantly effective in teaching reading particularly on hortatory exposition. However, the result shows that both the students who get the cloze technique and those who do not get that procedure, perform an enhancement on their post-test despite the insignificant difference.","PeriodicalId":429096,"journal":{"name":"Magister Scientiae","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magister Scientiae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33508/mgs.v50i1.3552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reading proficiency of Indonesian students is still relatively low, especially the reading performance in English as a foreign language. Thus, it needs several explorations on the technique suitable for students with diversities of reading competence. This study describes the effect of implementing the cloze procedure on teaching reading proficiency. The research method employed the design of quantitative causal-comparative. The population is the students of the second grade of senior high school with the samples involving two classes. To collect the data, the pre-test and post-test were applied to the classes. The result of the test was analyzed by using ANCOVA. The result shows that the sig. is higher than 0.05 (0.92 > 0.05). It reveals that the cloze procedure is not significantly effective in teaching reading particularly on hortatory exposition. However, the result shows that both the students who get the cloze technique and those who do not get that procedure, perform an enhancement on their post-test despite the insignificant difference.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
完形填空技巧与阅读能力:对高一学生的因果比较分析
印尼学生的阅读水平还比较低,尤其是英语作为外语的阅读表现。因此,需要对适合不同阅读能力学生的阅读技巧进行探索。本研究描述了实施完形填空对学生阅读能力教学的影响。研究方法采用定量因果比较法设计。总体为高中二年级的学生,样本涉及两个班级。为了收集数据,对班级进行了前测和后测。采用方差分析(ANCOVA)对试验结果进行分析。结果表明,显著性大于0.05(0.92 > 0.05)。结果表明,完形填空在阅读教学中效果不明显,尤其是在介绍性论述教学中。然而,结果显示,无论是完成完形填空练习的学生还是没有完成完形填空练习的学生,他们的后测成绩都有所提高,尽管差异不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
TRANSMITTING REFLECTIVE TEACHING PRACTICE INTO INDONESIAN EFL EDUCATORS’ PROFESSIONAL JOURNEYS STUDENTS' DIFFICULTIES IN WRITING EXPOSITORY ESSAY: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDY HEUTAGOGY AS A TRAINING APPROACH FOR TEACHERS IN THE ERA OF SOCIETY 5.0 UNLEASHING ENGLISH FLUENCY: HARNESSING TIKTOK'S POWER FOR SPEAKING SKILLS ENGLISH TEACHERS' IDENTITY INFLUENCE ON EMOTIONS AND BELIEFS: A NARRATIVE INQUIRY INTO PRIVATE AND STATE SCHOOL TEACHERS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1