Comparative Evaluation of Biomed InTray ® Colorex MRSA with BD ESwab Collection Kit/ BBL™ CHROMagar ® MRSA II

Kiran Bijlani, M. Gómez, Rowena D. Matias, A. Najafi, Ron Najafi, S. Arumugam
{"title":"Comparative Evaluation of Biomed InTray ® Colorex MRSA with BD ESwab Collection Kit/ BBL™ CHROMagar ® MRSA II","authors":"Kiran Bijlani, M. Gómez, Rowena D. Matias, A. Najafi, Ron Najafi, S. Arumugam","doi":"10.4172/2161-0703.1000273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one of the most dangerous antibiotic resistant pathogens and a common cause of most health-care acquired infections. MRSA causes skin, wound and bloodstream infections that can cause sepsis and ultimately lead to death. CDC and WHO have listed MRSA as a serious threat infection and included in The National Action Plan for Combating Antibiotic-resistant Bacteria. Early, reliable, and accurate diagnosis of MRSA in a clinical setting is critical for the treatment and control of infection in hospitals and the community. We comparatively evaluated the efficacy of two commercial diagnostic systems, Biomed InTray® Colorex and BDTM ESwab Regular Collection Kit/ BBL™ CHROMagar® (ESwab + CHROMagar®) to recover 51 MRSA clinical isolates. The percentage recovery of MRSA clinical isolates in InTray® and in ESwab + CHROMagar® was 99% and 75%, respectively. Our findings suggest that InTray® was more efficient than ESwab + CHROMagar® in recovering MRSA clinical isolates.","PeriodicalId":269971,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Microbiology and Diagnosis","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Microbiology and Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-0703.1000273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is one of the most dangerous antibiotic resistant pathogens and a common cause of most health-care acquired infections. MRSA causes skin, wound and bloodstream infections that can cause sepsis and ultimately lead to death. CDC and WHO have listed MRSA as a serious threat infection and included in The National Action Plan for Combating Antibiotic-resistant Bacteria. Early, reliable, and accurate diagnosis of MRSA in a clinical setting is critical for the treatment and control of infection in hospitals and the community. We comparatively evaluated the efficacy of two commercial diagnostic systems, Biomed InTray® Colorex and BDTM ESwab Regular Collection Kit/ BBL™ CHROMagar® (ESwab + CHROMagar®) to recover 51 MRSA clinical isolates. The percentage recovery of MRSA clinical isolates in InTray® and in ESwab + CHROMagar® was 99% and 75%, respectively. Our findings suggest that InTray® was more efficient than ESwab + CHROMagar® in recovering MRSA clinical isolates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
biomeed InTray®Colorex MRSA与BD ESwab Collection Kit/ BBL™CHROMagar®MRSA II的比较评价
耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)是最危险的抗生素耐药病原体之一,也是大多数卫生保健获得性感染的常见原因。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌引起皮肤、伤口和血液感染,可导致败血症并最终导致死亡。美国疾病控制与预防中心和世界卫生组织已将MRSA列为一种严重的威胁感染,并列入《抗击耐药细菌国家行动计划》。在临床环境中,MRSA的早期、可靠和准确诊断对于医院和社区感染的治疗和控制至关重要。我们比较评估了两种商用诊断系统,Biomed InTray®Colorex和BDTM ESwab常规采集试剂盒/ BBL™CHROMagar®(ESwab + CHROMagar®)对51个MRSA临床分离物的疗效。MRSA临床分离株在InTray®和ESwab + CHROMagar®中的回收率分别为99%和75%。我们的研究结果表明,在回收MRSA临床分离株方面,InTray®比ESwab + CHROMagar®更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Occurrence of Multidrug Resistance Escherichia coli and Other Bacteria Species Associated with Urinary Tract Infection in Two Geopolitical Zones of Ondo State, Nigeria Identical Subsequences of Contiguous Amino Acids in Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin and in Human Proteins A Comparison of Two Enrichment Broth Medium for the Isolation and Identification of Streptococcus agalactiae from Vaginal Swabs Kodamaea ohmeri, An Emerging Yeast in Tunisia: First Identification in Three Case Reports and Literature Review Effectivity of Caspofungin on the Resistant Isolates of Candida albicans
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1