Price of MEV: Towards a Game Theoretical Approach to MEV

Bruno Mazorra, Michael Reynolds, Vanesa Daza
{"title":"Price of MEV: Towards a Game Theoretical Approach to MEV","authors":"Bruno Mazorra, Michael Reynolds, Vanesa Daza","doi":"10.1145/3560832.3563433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Maximal (also miner) extractable value, or MEV, usually refers to the value that privileged players can extract by strategically ordering, censoring, and placing transactions in a blockchain. Each blockchain network, which we refer to as a domain, has its own consensus, ordering, and block-creation mechanisms, which gives rise to different optimal strategies to extract MEV. The strategic behaviour of rational players, known as searchers, lead to MEV games that have different impacts and externalities in each domain. Several ordering mechanisms, which determine the inclusion and position of transactions in a block, have been considered to construct alternative games to organise MEV extraction, and minimize negative externalities; examples include sealed bid auctions, first input first output, and private priority gas auctions. However, to date, no sufficiently formal and abstract definition of MEV games have been made. In this paper, we take a step toward the formalization of MEV games and compare different ordering mechanisms and their externalities. In particular, we attempt to formalize games that arise from common knowledge MEV opportunities, such as arbitrage and sandwich attacks. In defining these games, we utilise a theoretical framework that provides groundwork for several important roles and concepts, such as the searcher, sequencer, domain, and bundle. We also introduce the price of MEV as the price of anarchy of MEV games, a measure that provides formal comparison between different ordering mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":366325,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2022 ACM CCS Workshop on Decentralized Finance and Security","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2022 ACM CCS Workshop on Decentralized Finance and Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3560832.3563433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Maximal (also miner) extractable value, or MEV, usually refers to the value that privileged players can extract by strategically ordering, censoring, and placing transactions in a blockchain. Each blockchain network, which we refer to as a domain, has its own consensus, ordering, and block-creation mechanisms, which gives rise to different optimal strategies to extract MEV. The strategic behaviour of rational players, known as searchers, lead to MEV games that have different impacts and externalities in each domain. Several ordering mechanisms, which determine the inclusion and position of transactions in a block, have been considered to construct alternative games to organise MEV extraction, and minimize negative externalities; examples include sealed bid auctions, first input first output, and private priority gas auctions. However, to date, no sufficiently formal and abstract definition of MEV games have been made. In this paper, we take a step toward the formalization of MEV games and compare different ordering mechanisms and their externalities. In particular, we attempt to formalize games that arise from common knowledge MEV opportunities, such as arbitrage and sandwich attacks. In defining these games, we utilise a theoretical framework that provides groundwork for several important roles and concepts, such as the searcher, sequencer, domain, and bundle. We also introduce the price of MEV as the price of anarchy of MEV games, a measure that provides formal comparison between different ordering mechanisms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MEV的价格:从博弈论的角度研究MEV
最大(也是矿工)可提取价值,或MEV,通常是指特权玩家可以通过在区块链中战略性地排序、审查和放置交易来提取的价值。每个区块链网络,我们称之为一个域,都有自己的共识、排序和区块创建机制,这就产生了不同的最佳策略来提取MEV。理性玩家(即搜索者)的策略行为导致MEV游戏在每个领域具有不同的影响和外部性。几个排序机制决定了交易在区块中的包含和位置,已经被考虑构建替代游戏来组织MEV提取,并最小化负面外部性;例如密封投标拍卖、先投入先产出和私人优先天然气拍卖。然而,到目前为止,还没有足够正式和抽象的MEV游戏定义。在本文中,我们向MEV游戏的形式化迈进了一步,并比较了不同的排序机制及其外部性。特别是,我们试图将源自常识MEV机会(如套利和三明治攻击)的游戏形式化。在定义这些游戏时,我们使用了一个理论框架,该框架为几个重要的角色和概念提供了基础,如搜索者、排序者、域和bundle。我们还将MEV的价格作为MEV游戏的无政府状态价格,这是一种提供不同排序机制之间正式比较的度量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quantifying Loss in Automated Market Makers A Note On Borrowing Constant Function Market Maker Shares Concentrated Liquidity Analysis in Uniswap V3 Strategic Peer Selection Using Transaction Value and Latency Improving Proof of Stake Economic Security via MEV Redistribution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1