Interaction Models Matter in the Evaluation of Quality of Conceptual Models

Beatriz Marín, Giovanni Giachetti, Ó. Pastor, A. Abran
{"title":"Interaction Models Matter in the Evaluation of Quality of Conceptual Models","authors":"Beatriz Marín, Giovanni Giachetti, Ó. Pastor, A. Abran","doi":"10.1109/QSIC.2013.38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conceptual models are key artefacts in software production processes that are based on MDD technology. These conceptual models are used as inputs in the process of code generation. Therefore, it is very important to be able to evaluate the quality of the models in order to improve the quality of the corresponding final applications. The development of an effective quality assurance technique requires knowing what kind of defects may occur in practice in the conceptual models used in MDD approaches. Conventional Conceptual Modeling approaches focus on the detection of defects that comes from either the data perspective or the process perspective. However, the interaction perspective also matters! This paper presents a list of technical defects that can be identified when performing the interaction modeling of an MDD environment. This list of defects provides an initial approach to evaluate the completeness of Interaction Models with respect to their use for the automatic generation of a final application. This paper also presents an example that illustrates how the completeness of an Interaction Model can be evaluated through defect detection.","PeriodicalId":404921,"journal":{"name":"2013 13th International Conference on Quality Software","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 13th International Conference on Quality Software","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QSIC.2013.38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conceptual models are key artefacts in software production processes that are based on MDD technology. These conceptual models are used as inputs in the process of code generation. Therefore, it is very important to be able to evaluate the quality of the models in order to improve the quality of the corresponding final applications. The development of an effective quality assurance technique requires knowing what kind of defects may occur in practice in the conceptual models used in MDD approaches. Conventional Conceptual Modeling approaches focus on the detection of defects that comes from either the data perspective or the process perspective. However, the interaction perspective also matters! This paper presents a list of technical defects that can be identified when performing the interaction modeling of an MDD environment. This list of defects provides an initial approach to evaluate the completeness of Interaction Models with respect to their use for the automatic generation of a final application. This paper also presents an example that illustrates how the completeness of an Interaction Model can be evaluated through defect detection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
交互模型在概念模型质量评价中的作用
概念模型是基于MDD技术的软件生产过程中的关键工件。这些概念模型在代码生成过程中用作输入。因此,为了提高相应的最终应用程序的质量,能够对模型的质量进行评估是非常重要的。开发有效的质量保证技术需要了解MDD方法中使用的概念模型在实践中可能出现的缺陷类型。传统的概念建模方法侧重于检测来自数据透视图或过程透视图的缺陷。然而,交互视角也很重要!本文给出了在执行MDD环境的交互建模时可以识别的技术缺陷列表。这个缺陷列表提供了一种评估交互模型的完整性的初始方法,该方法涉及到它们对最终应用程序的自动生成的使用。本文还提供了一个例子,说明如何通过缺陷检测来评估交互模型的完整性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adaptive Combinatorial Testing Considerations in Designing Human-Computer Interfaces for Elderly People The ART of Divide and Conquer: An Innovative Approach to Improving the Efficiency of Adaptive Random Testing An Empirical Study of Adoption of Software Testing in Open Source Projects Supporting Reliability Modeling and Analysis for Component-Based Software Architecture: An XML-Based Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1