Simulation and cost analysis of group authentication protocols

Adarsh Kumar, K. Gopal, A. Aggarwal
{"title":"Simulation and cost analysis of group authentication protocols","authors":"Adarsh Kumar, K. Gopal, A. Aggarwal","doi":"10.1109/IC3.2016.7880249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) is an efficient technology for identification, tracking and group proof construction. The multi-round protocols for authentication and group proof construction increase the cost with increase in participants. In this work, computational and communication cost of multi-round protocol is calculated to identify the protocol with least cost and high security. The computational cost is computed using number of rounds and messages, Message Authentication Code (MACO) operations, messages sent per participant and messages received per participant. The communication cost is computed using size of message sent and size of message received. In order to reduce the computational and communication cost, two lightweight group authentication protocols are selected for refinement. The protocols are: Juel's protocol, and Saito and Sakurai protocol. Three refinements are proposed which convert these protocols from two-party group construction to n-party group construction. Results show that refinements reduce the cost compared to Juel's protocol and Saito and Sakurai's protocol. It is observed that high security in group proof construction is still infeasible, thus if security is required to be maximum then multi-round protocol should be preferred. In this work, a multi-round authentication protocol of [1] is analyzed for comparative security analysis. Simulation analysis shows that performance of proposed authentication protocol in multi-round category as well as single-round category is better than state-of-art protocols.","PeriodicalId":294210,"journal":{"name":"2016 Ninth International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 Ninth International Conference on Contemporary Computing (IC3)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3.2016.7880249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) is an efficient technology for identification, tracking and group proof construction. The multi-round protocols for authentication and group proof construction increase the cost with increase in participants. In this work, computational and communication cost of multi-round protocol is calculated to identify the protocol with least cost and high security. The computational cost is computed using number of rounds and messages, Message Authentication Code (MACO) operations, messages sent per participant and messages received per participant. The communication cost is computed using size of message sent and size of message received. In order to reduce the computational and communication cost, two lightweight group authentication protocols are selected for refinement. The protocols are: Juel's protocol, and Saito and Sakurai protocol. Three refinements are proposed which convert these protocols from two-party group construction to n-party group construction. Results show that refinements reduce the cost compared to Juel's protocol and Saito and Sakurai's protocol. It is observed that high security in group proof construction is still infeasible, thus if security is required to be maximum then multi-round protocol should be preferred. In this work, a multi-round authentication protocol of [1] is analyzed for comparative security analysis. Simulation analysis shows that performance of proposed authentication protocol in multi-round category as well as single-round category is better than state-of-art protocols.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
组认证协议仿真与成本分析
射频识别(RFID)是一种高效的身份识别、跟踪和群证明技术。多轮认证和组证明协议的成本随着参与者的增加而增加。本文通过计算多轮协议的计算和通信开销,找出开销最小、安全性高的协议。计算成本是使用轮数和消息数、消息身份验证码(Message Authentication Code, MACO)操作、每个参与者发送的消息和每个参与者接收的消息来计算的。使用发送的消息大小和接收的消息大小来计算通信成本。为了减少计算和通信开销,选择两个轻量级组认证协议进行细化。协议是:Juel协议,Saito和Sakurai协议。提出了三种改进方法,将这些协议从两方组构造转换为n方组构造。结果表明,与Juel的协议、斋藤和樱井的协议相比,改进后的协议降低了成本。观察到,在群证明构造中,高安全性仍然是不可行的,因此,如果需要最大的安全性,则应首选多轮协议。本文对[1]的多轮认证协议进行了比较安全性分析。仿真分析表明,所提出的认证协议在多轮分类和单轮分类下的性能都优于现有的认证协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intuitionistic fuzzy ant colony optimization for course sequencing in E-learning JIIT-edu: An android application for college faculty Exploring academia industry linkage through co-authorship social networks Framework to extract context vectors from unstructured data using big data analytics Temperature and energy aware scheduling of heterogeneous processors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1