A proposed definition of Critical Care Retrieval in the South African context

Cornelius Venter, Nathan Conradie, M. Venter, L. Jordaan, Maryna Venter, D. Stanton, W. Stassen
{"title":"A proposed definition of Critical Care Retrieval in the South African context","authors":"Cornelius Venter, Nathan Conradie, M. Venter, L. Jordaan, Maryna Venter, D. Stanton, W. Stassen","doi":"10.24213/2-1-4477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Critical care retrieval is a nascent field in South Africa. An increasing number of private and provincial emergency medical services are starting to invest in developing and setting up dedicated critical care retrieval services (CCRS). To date, there are no minimum standards or definitions on what constitutes a CCRS in the South African context. The aim of this paper is to describe the development of and propose a consensus definition of CCRS within the South African context. \nMethods: A literature search was performed to determine the key aspects of CCRS definitions elsewhere. An initial draft definition was circulated to the CCRS working group of the Emergency Care Society of South Africa (ECSSA) for commentary. Comments were collated, and a second round of commentary was undertaken. Finally, a consensus meeting was held through video-conferencing to finalise the definition presented herein. Thereafter, the definition was circulated to key role-players in emergency and critical care, both locally and internationally, for endorsement. The definition, as it is presented, has been endorsed by the ECSSA, the Southern African Society of Critical Care (SASCC), and the International Board for Specialty Certification (IBSC). \nResults: The proposed definition outlines five equally important aspects that should be demonstrable and interlinked to be denoted a CCRS. These five aspects are: specific patient populations, case selection, dedicated crew with additional training, dedicated equipment, and continuous quality management and training. \nConclusion: Numerous questions remain unanswered regarding the best approach for CCRS development in South Africa and internationally. Defining what CCRS is in a South African context is a necessary departure point for further research endeavours to develop a core curriculum and practice standards.","PeriodicalId":287490,"journal":{"name":"South Afican Journal of Pre-hospital Emergency Care","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Afican Journal of Pre-hospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24213/2-1-4477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Critical care retrieval is a nascent field in South Africa. An increasing number of private and provincial emergency medical services are starting to invest in developing and setting up dedicated critical care retrieval services (CCRS). To date, there are no minimum standards or definitions on what constitutes a CCRS in the South African context. The aim of this paper is to describe the development of and propose a consensus definition of CCRS within the South African context. Methods: A literature search was performed to determine the key aspects of CCRS definitions elsewhere. An initial draft definition was circulated to the CCRS working group of the Emergency Care Society of South Africa (ECSSA) for commentary. Comments were collated, and a second round of commentary was undertaken. Finally, a consensus meeting was held through video-conferencing to finalise the definition presented herein. Thereafter, the definition was circulated to key role-players in emergency and critical care, both locally and internationally, for endorsement. The definition, as it is presented, has been endorsed by the ECSSA, the Southern African Society of Critical Care (SASCC), and the International Board for Specialty Certification (IBSC). Results: The proposed definition outlines five equally important aspects that should be demonstrable and interlinked to be denoted a CCRS. These five aspects are: specific patient populations, case selection, dedicated crew with additional training, dedicated equipment, and continuous quality management and training. Conclusion: Numerous questions remain unanswered regarding the best approach for CCRS development in South Africa and internationally. Defining what CCRS is in a South African context is a necessary departure point for further research endeavours to develop a core curriculum and practice standards.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在南非背景下提出的重症监护检索的定义
背景:重症监护检索是一个新兴领域在南非。越来越多的私营和省级紧急医疗服务机构开始投资开发和建立专门的重症监护检索服务。迄今为止,在南非的情况下,没有关于构成社区责任的最低标准或定义。本文的目的是描述南非背景下CCRS的发展并提出共识定义。方法:通过文献检索来确定其他地方CCRS定义的关键方面。一份最初的定义草案已分发给南非急救协会(ECSSA)的CCRS工作组,征求其评论。对评论进行了整理,并进行了第二轮评论。最后,通过视频会议举行了一次协商一致会议,以确定本文提出的定义。此后,将该定义分发给当地和国际上急诊和重症监护方面的关键角色,以供核准。该定义已经得到了ECSSA、南部非洲重症监护协会(SASCC)和国际专业认证委员会(IBSC)的认可。结果:提议的定义概述了五个同等重要的方面,这些方面应该是可证明的和相互关联的,以表示为CCRS。这五个方面是:特定的患者群体、病例选择、经过额外培训的专门工作人员、专用设备以及持续的质量管理和培训。结论:关于南非和国际上CCRS发展的最佳方法,许多问题仍未得到解答。在南非的背景下定义什么是CCRS是进一步研究工作以制定核心课程和实践标准的必要出发点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Extent of post-traumatic stress disorder among Eastern Cape emergency care workers in the public health care sector A proposed definition of Critical Care Retrieval in the South African context Medication storage in Emergency Medical Services: Temperature ranges from a South African sample A Retrospective study of the pre-hospital trauma burden managed by the Western Cape Government Emergency Medical Services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1