Immersive virtual reality versus webcam in an online language course

Borja Herrera
{"title":"Immersive virtual reality versus webcam in an online language\n course","authors":"Borja Herrera","doi":"10.14705/rpnet.2021.54.1322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the differences between Immersive Virtual\n Reality (IVR) and the webcam (WBC) in the context of a Spanish\n distance-learning course. Two specific objectives were set: (1) to determine\n the existence of a relationship of dependence between the device used and\n the oral interaction, and (2) to analyse the existence of a dependency\n relationship between the device utilised and the perception of copresence.\n To that end, online courses and semi-structured interviews were conducted.\n Regarding the first objective, there is a higher chance of speaking\n exchanges between student-tutor and tutor-student when using WBC. As for the\n second objective, we did not have sufficient feedback to determine whether\n the perception of copresence varies depending on the two profiles. However,\n the analysis indicates that non-verbal communication was essential for IVR\n volunteers to experience copresence. The conclusions suggest that the IVR\n could be more appropriate than WBC for socio-constructivist and\n communicative teaching pedagogies2.","PeriodicalId":350173,"journal":{"name":"CALL and professionalisation: short papers from EUROCALL 2021","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CALL and professionalisation: short papers from EUROCALL 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2021.54.1322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates the differences between Immersive Virtual Reality (IVR) and the webcam (WBC) in the context of a Spanish distance-learning course. Two specific objectives were set: (1) to determine the existence of a relationship of dependence between the device used and the oral interaction, and (2) to analyse the existence of a dependency relationship between the device utilised and the perception of copresence. To that end, online courses and semi-structured interviews were conducted. Regarding the first objective, there is a higher chance of speaking exchanges between student-tutor and tutor-student when using WBC. As for the second objective, we did not have sufficient feedback to determine whether the perception of copresence varies depending on the two profiles. However, the analysis indicates that non-verbal communication was essential for IVR volunteers to experience copresence. The conclusions suggest that the IVR could be more appropriate than WBC for socio-constructivist and communicative teaching pedagogies2.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
沉浸式虚拟现实与网络摄像头在在线语言课程中的对比
本文研究了沉浸式虚拟现实(IVR)和网络摄像头(WBC)在西班牙语远程学习课程中的差异。设定了两个具体目标:(1)确定所使用的设备与口腔互动之间是否存在依赖关系,以及(2)分析所使用的设备与共同感知之间是否存在依赖关系。为此,开展了在线课程和半结构化访谈。关于第一个目标,使用WBC时,学生-导师和导师-学生之间的口语交流机会更高。至于第二个目标,我们没有足够的反馈来确定共同存在的感知是否会因两种概况而有所不同。然而,分析表明,非语言交流对于IVR志愿者体验存在是必不可少的。结论表明IVR比WBC更适合社会建构主义和交际教学法2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The HERO project: language training for migrants’ professional career as caregivers through blended learning Students’ perceptions of digital storytelling in primarily asynchronous EFL classes at a Japanese university Collaborative skills in language courses: how to support pupils? Pedagogical experiences in a virtual exchange project using high-immersion virtual reality for intercultural language learning Developing intercultural communicative competence in the ClerKing telecollaborative project
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1