Proactive Recommendation Delivery

Adem Sabic
{"title":"Proactive Recommendation Delivery","authors":"Adem Sabic","doi":"10.1145/2959100.2959108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main purpose of Recommender Systems is to minimize the effects of information/choice overload. Recommendations are usually prepared based on the estimation of what would be useful or interesting to users. Thus, it is important that they are relevant to users, whether to their information needs, current activity or emotional state. This requires deep understanding of users' context but also the knowledge of the history of previous users' interactions within the system (e.g. clicks, views, etc.). But even when the recommendations are highly relevant, their delivery to users can be very problematic. Many existing systems require active user participation (explicit interaction with the recommender system) and attention. Or, on other side of spectrum, there are RS that handle recommendation delivery without any consideration for users' preferences of when, where or how the recommendations are being delivered. Proactive Recommender Systems promise a more autonomous approach for recommendation delivery, by anticipating information needs in advance and acting on users' behalf with minimal efforts and without disturbance. This paper describes our work and interest in identifying and analyzing the factors that can influence acceptance and use of proactively delivered recommendations.","PeriodicalId":315651,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems","volume":"25 2A 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2959100.2959108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The main purpose of Recommender Systems is to minimize the effects of information/choice overload. Recommendations are usually prepared based on the estimation of what would be useful or interesting to users. Thus, it is important that they are relevant to users, whether to their information needs, current activity or emotional state. This requires deep understanding of users' context but also the knowledge of the history of previous users' interactions within the system (e.g. clicks, views, etc.). But even when the recommendations are highly relevant, their delivery to users can be very problematic. Many existing systems require active user participation (explicit interaction with the recommender system) and attention. Or, on other side of spectrum, there are RS that handle recommendation delivery without any consideration for users' preferences of when, where or how the recommendations are being delivered. Proactive Recommender Systems promise a more autonomous approach for recommendation delivery, by anticipating information needs in advance and acting on users' behalf with minimal efforts and without disturbance. This paper describes our work and interest in identifying and analyzing the factors that can influence acceptance and use of proactively delivered recommendations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主动推荐交付
推荐系统的主要目的是尽量减少信息/选择过载的影响。推荐通常是基于对用户有用或感兴趣的估计而准备的。因此,重要的是它们与用户相关,无论是与用户的信息需求、当前活动还是情感状态相关。这需要深入了解用户的上下文,还需要了解以前用户在系统中的交互历史(例如点击、视图等)。但是,即使推荐是高度相关的,它们传递给用户的过程也可能非常成问题。许多现有的系统需要用户的积极参与(与推荐系统的明确交互)和关注。或者,在频谱的另一边,有一些RS处理推荐交付,而不考虑用户对何时、何地或如何交付推荐的偏好。主动推荐系统承诺提供一种更自主的推荐方式,通过提前预测信息需求,并以最小的努力和不受干扰的方式代表用户行事。本文描述了我们在识别和分析可能影响接受和使用主动交付的建议的因素方面的工作和兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Opening Remarks Mining Information for the Cold-Item Problem Are You Influenced by Others When Rating?: Improve Rating Prediction by Conformity Modeling Contrasting Offline and Online Results when Evaluating Recommendation Algorithms Intent-Aware Diversification Using a Constrained PLSA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1