Timing-Specified Controllers with Feedback for Human-Robot Handovers

Alap Kshirsagar, Rahul Ravi, H. Kress-Gazit, G. Hoffman
{"title":"Timing-Specified Controllers with Feedback for Human-Robot Handovers","authors":"Alap Kshirsagar, Rahul Ravi, H. Kress-Gazit, G. Hoffman","doi":"10.1109/RO-MAN53752.2022.9900856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We develop and evaluate two human-robot handover controllers that allow end-users to specify timing parameters for the robot reach motion, and that provide feedback if the robot cannot satisfy those constraints. End-user tuning with feedback is a useful controller feature in settings where robots have to be re-programmed for varying task requirements but end-users do not have programming knowledge. The two controllers we propose are both receding-horizon controllers that differ in their objective function, and their user specified parameters, and subsequently their user-interface: One controller uses a minimum cumulative jerk (MCJ) objective function, and the other a minimum cumulative error (MCE) objective function. We implemented the controllers on a collaborative robot and conducted two controlled experiments to compare the user experience and performance of these controllers vis-à-vis a baseline proportional velocity (PV) controller. In each experiment, participants (n = 30) interactively tuned the controller parameters, and collaborated with a robot to perform a time-constrained repetitive task. We found that the timing controller with the MCE implementation can provide a better user experience, both while setting the parameters (p =0.011) and performing the handovers with the robot (p < 0.001), and fewer failures (p =0.016) compared to the PV controller, however the MCJ implementation did not provide better user experience compared to the PV controller. The MCJ controller also resulted in more failures than the PV controller. These results could inform the design of usable and effective end-user configurable controllers for human-robot interaction.","PeriodicalId":250997,"journal":{"name":"2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","volume":"57 4 Suppl 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN53752.2022.9900856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We develop and evaluate two human-robot handover controllers that allow end-users to specify timing parameters for the robot reach motion, and that provide feedback if the robot cannot satisfy those constraints. End-user tuning with feedback is a useful controller feature in settings where robots have to be re-programmed for varying task requirements but end-users do not have programming knowledge. The two controllers we propose are both receding-horizon controllers that differ in their objective function, and their user specified parameters, and subsequently their user-interface: One controller uses a minimum cumulative jerk (MCJ) objective function, and the other a minimum cumulative error (MCE) objective function. We implemented the controllers on a collaborative robot and conducted two controlled experiments to compare the user experience and performance of these controllers vis-à-vis a baseline proportional velocity (PV) controller. In each experiment, participants (n = 30) interactively tuned the controller parameters, and collaborated with a robot to perform a time-constrained repetitive task. We found that the timing controller with the MCE implementation can provide a better user experience, both while setting the parameters (p =0.011) and performing the handovers with the robot (p < 0.001), and fewer failures (p =0.016) compared to the PV controller, however the MCJ implementation did not provide better user experience compared to the PV controller. The MCJ controller also resulted in more failures than the PV controller. These results could inform the design of usable and effective end-user configurable controllers for human-robot interaction.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人机切换的带反馈定时控制器
我们开发并评估了两种人机切换控制器,这两种控制器允许最终用户指定机器人到达运动的定时参数,并在机器人不能满足这些约束时提供反馈。在机器人必须为不同的任务要求重新编程,但最终用户没有编程知识的情况下,带有反馈的最终用户调整是一个有用的控制器功能。我们提出的两个控制器都是后退地平线控制器,它们的目标函数、用户指定的参数以及随后的用户界面都不同:一个控制器使用最小累积偏差(MCJ)目标函数,另一个使用最小累积误差(MCE)目标函数。我们在协作机器人上实现了控制器,并进行了两次受控实验,以比较这些控制器与-à-vis基线比例速度(PV)控制器的用户体验和性能。在每个实验中,参与者(n = 30)交互调整控制器参数,并与机器人合作执行有时间限制的重复任务。我们发现,与PV控制器相比,具有MCE实现的定时控制器在设置参数(p =0.011)和与机器人进行切换(p < 0.001)时可以提供更好的用户体验,并且故障(p =0.016)更少,但MCJ实现的用户体验并不比PV控制器更好。MCJ控制器也比PV控制器导致更多的故障。这些结果可以为人机交互的可用和有效的最终用户可配置控制器的设计提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
I Can’t Believe That Happened! : Exploring Expressivity in Collaborative Storytelling with the Tabletop Robot Haru Nothing About Us Without Us: a participatory design for an Inclusive Signing Tiago Robot Preliminary Investigation of Collision Risk Assessment with Vision for Selecting Targets Paid Attention to by Mobile Robot Step-by-Step Task Plan Explanations Beyond Causal Links Contributions of user tests in a Living Lab in the co-design process of human robot interaction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1